I would rather live next to flaming gay people than uncultured people in the hood.
I lived in a gay community once, it was the most quiet, safe place, one could imagine.
And looking back, I wish I had stayed there, just cause it was quiet and safe.
I'd much rather live next to a gay couple in love, than some urban B female with random thug male friends that show up at night, and loud kids that make the most G awful shrieking sounds one has ever heard, and who love to slam doors, litter, fight, talk loud and resolve all issues with gun fire.
Give me a younger cute soft skinned, polite W gay couple any day of the week to live next to over hood types.
Sometimes I ask myself if all of 'these people' were vanished into dust, would life change for the better or worse...
For instance, I play around and ask self if all 'B' people, where I stay, were vanished into dust, just gone forever, what would I instantly notice, and would it be for the good or bad...well lets see just for fun, if all B folks, where I stay, were vanished from the earth, here's what I'd immediately notice.
1. street crime, shootings, would drop by like 95%.
2. The streets and roads would be cleaner, apartment complexes and sidewalks would not have litter strung all over them.
3. Would not have to hear the deep base sound coming from car speakers while trying to rest...to me that's a plus.
4. Could walk outside, at night, anytime I felt like it, and feel safe.
5. Wouldn't have neighbors who slam doors.
Just to name stuff off top of head...
Now if W folks were to all vanish from where I live, here's what I'd immediately notice
1. Crime would increase
2. I'd be unemployed
3. For the most part emergency and 911 service would cease to exist, it would be every person for themselves.
4. I'd have no one of reason to talk to anymore, instead just B males who mumble and still use colonial era slang when they speak.
5. A/C maintenance would cease, so would just about every other type of service that keeps stuff up and running.
And I'll stop there.
You come to your own conclusion on the above...
And I express this as an honest person of color...
It's just, for whatever reason, every social headache I have to deal with on daily basis mainly comes from inconsiderate B citizens...not sure why.
Last Edit: Jul 21, 2019 19:32:01 GMT -5 by X factor
This may sound mean, but if I can't be honest, what's the point of being alive?
As a person of color, raise from K-12 around 'whites', in Easter WA State.
I can tell you there's a big difference in how people raise their young....from rural to urban environments, and even color.
From earliest years, raised around lighter voice tone of 'Wh_tes'...from earliest years.
I'm just use to women sounding feminine.
Then move to urban area where women sound masculine, and have tattoos more manly then even man do, speaking of B women.
And on top of having masculine tattoos, have these gross long, gigantic, exagerated finger nails, that to most guys (even though won't say aloud), look more like claws, or Eagle talons...gross!!
Long gigantic, fingernails is not a feminine thing, it's more like a 'being under a spell of a demon' thing, according to some.
Many urban B females, when in full painted attire look more like males in drag, to many B dudes, than like women or females...
I mean what world are we living in when younger W dudes, say 18 to 25, have softer hands and feet than their urban B female counter parts do...
No wonder so much 'Down low' stuff occurs withing the urban community.
Black dudes seeking out thin, soft handed, no nails, soft feeted W dudes over their goblin female opposites.
I mean how the hell am I going to date or be attracted to a urban B female that has larger, rougher hands than my own...with long jagged horse hoof nails on top of it all...gross!
Then when take off shoes, feet and toes look more like stomps...thick azz toe nails that could be used as weapons...and chappy feet.
How is that feminine?
I've learned that not all females are feminine, if that makes sense...
It's sad that many younger W or Asian or Indian, or ect males, have more fem qualities about them than urban short, wide and fat B females do.
Not judging on worth, simply making observations on attractiveness.
And a lot of it has to do with 'mating' practices.
Why do you think most rich people look 'good' or 'cute', it's because they're way more selective over whom they sleep with, where as in more poor communities, at least the urban 'B' community, looks and genetics not considered, is why people in the isolated Southern hood areas just seem to get more uglier, rather than taller and pronounced.
Women who look like men and all, so in a way you have to be either gay or drunk or high or stoned to date and mate with some of these pre historic looking Southern urban B females I've seen lately.
Some of them remind me of human insects...with all the odd colors, gigantic nails funny body shapes and all...
The world is backwards and someone is playing a joke when a 19 year old thin W dude looks more feminine, has softer feet, softer hands, than a 28 year old urban B female...somethings wrong here...
Last Edit: Oct 18, 2019 17:26:54 GMT -5 by X factor
I hate being mean and I hate racism and or racist...but my comments based on real life observed behavior of others.
For instance, whenever they construct new large apartment complexes, at least where I stay, and this whole 'affordable housing' pitch, you already know who's going to flood into them.
SB Mother's with kids, and hang around Boyfriends, who are usually felons ect.
Same o same o.
Personally, as a single male of color, I'd rather live around Trans sexual or fem younger W males than Urban B females who are totally set in their ways, have very small view of the world, and deep down inside are 'anti-male'.
As a male of color, to date a B female, I'd have to 'shrink'...and become nothing more than a hoodish breeder...that's all they really want of you anymore...a future ex.
I know where I stay now, it's always single B females with kids, that ever move in...on what, vouchers??
B women seem to love breeding male offspring as 'pets', minature males they can be the boss over, then as soon as male reaches maturity, the love affair ends, son is bitter, joins gang, hurts others, we read about it in newspaper or radio and so forth.
And notice how W mothers allow their sons hair to grow out long, that's called expression.
But notice how 95% of B mothers always shave their sons head bald...already forming in the male child this bland image of self, this 'breeder' image of self.
I find that very selfish, very hyper selfish actually...and then wonder why by age 15 the W male youth is much more well rounded culturally and artistically, cause were given way more 'range' when young.
Some times I think W slave owner ghosts from the past still live through B women of today
I mean the residue of colonialism can so clearly be seen with how Southern B women raise their sons....to be bland, bald and dull.
Even when W mothers adopt B male kids, the W mother allows their hair to grow long and artsy...
Is why just not interested in dating Southern B women, in that I'd have to shrink to nothing more than a mindless, dull, breeder in order to get along.
Last Edit: Oct 18, 2019 17:18:32 GMT -5 by X factor
I mean look at this comparison....younger W male feet vs B female feet...come on.
Is the Jewish God playing some kind of joke or something???
How in the heck do the W dudes feet look more soft, are more soft, appealing, than the B female feet are???
That tells me that gender has nothing to do with being feminine or soft.
That tells me that being feminine or soft is more of a mentality, than a given birth reality, at least for some.
Now this illustration has nothing to do with 'value' or 'self worth' or anything like that, but has everything to do with whom others are attracted to.
I could of lied and said the W feet were that of women, and the B feet was a man, and how would your __ have responded??
Sorry, but regardless of color, just not attracted to women with rough, chappy, manly feet...
Actually, 'manly feet' is wrong, cause obviously many W males have very soft feet and toes, no fault of their own...and doesn't mean they're gay or sissy, just nature and breeding I guess.
Life is twisted man, I tell ya, life is twisted.
IN that if I were choosing a wife simply based on feet, I'd of ended up marrying a guy...wow...wow...
Almost makes me wish younger W males could get pregnant, have kids, and raise family with.
Ye, sometimes I think 'God' or the creator should of made it where both genders could get pregnant, like with earth worms, in that earthworms are bi gender, male one minute, female the next, in order to survive I guess.
This may be an insane asylum, but totally confused here, how is it that the W male foot looks more soft, softer, than the B female foot?
This is odd man, very odd
Not so odd
Look 'e' here and compare
The B female foot has long, jagged, untamed wild looking toe nails, very primative. But notice how the W male foot reflects modern 'man', in that the W male foot has very short nails, which represents 'being tame', civilized and humble.
I don't know about you, but if dating strictly based on feet, I'd much rather have that W male feet guys feet on my chest, or in my hands, or on my lap, than the other feet.
Sorry, I'm just attracted to 'soft', and people who are intelligent enough to pay attention to details.
Umm...why do B females have such pre historic looking feet that look scarred?
You dummy, it's cause many B urban females wear shoes that are like way to small for their feet, as such get callouses, if these urban B females were bright, instead of always buying shoes 1 to 2 sizes smaller than feet, they'd by larger shoes, and as such their feet wouldn't always look so scarred and burnt.