|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 26, 2014 18:28:23 GMT -5
 According to Laura Ingraham, all blacks/minorities, who voted for 'R' Senator Thad Cochran are nothing more than 19-35 year old welfare recipient types, who are totally uneducated, dense, and only voted for Rep Thad Cochran cause they want free food, and other free 'stuff' and handouts.  According to Laura Ingraham, this is the typical black voter. Don't believe me, archive her show from earlier today. She said the only reason why blacks voted for Sen Cochran is cause they want 'free stuff', and are on welfare. Wow... After a while bigots become so use to being bigots that they don't even notice what they're implying on their talk shows. And it's why I've always said the biggest contributors to Democratic candidates are Conservative talk show hosts who at times (most of the time) reveal things that normal politicians wouldn't. Laura Ingraham basically shared today, on her show, what millions of other GOP types feel, or how they view, the 'black vote' or voters. They assume black voters only vote for candidates who promise them the most 'free stuff'. They, GOP types like Laura, have basically reduced the black vote, person, down to nothing more than some 1920's bafoonish stereotype character who has IQ of 5, and only votes for those whom will provide free chicken. They live by their ugly perception of others, and not reality. Never mind all the plumbers, firemen, police officers, cooks, truck drivers, teachers, coaches, doctors, nurses, Lawyers, electricians, ect whom voted for Thad Cochran for their own reasons. No, instead Laura Ingraham reduced the 'black' voter to nothing more than chicken eating single mothers sitting on porch with nothing better to do during the day than watch Jerry Springer. And Mainstream GOP types wonder why blacks/minorities steer clear of them, it's do to ugly stereotypes like this, that they share over the radio to millions. This idea that all blacks, even those who work professional jobs, are all looking for handouts. People are insulted by that. One can only make those kind of assumptions when one has no black friends in the real streets, in real main street, real working class hoods, or Professional areas (outside of DC) where many blacks earned degrees and work important jobs. No, according to GOP types like Laura, all black voters eat chicken, while waiting for welfare check. Keep it up Laura...just keep allowing your ugly views of others to spill out of your mouth on radio show. Thanks for helping ensure more Democrats get elected... |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 20, 2014 20:28:48 GMT -5
GOP blocks minimum wage increase Senate Rep's block minimum wage increase < link in red Why do talk radio show hosts lie? The President has nothing to do with 'low wages'. It's GOP that's against 'collective bargaining, high wage union jobs, and who are against increasing pay for average working Americans.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Dec 1, 2014 19:57:35 GMT -5
 'Under President Obama, black unemployment is high', says Laura the talk show hosts. As if that's Obamas fault. First off 'black' is a very generic term...kind of a meaningless one in this day and age, cause it attempts to generically lump to many people together of varying backgrounds, religions, education, morals, beliefs, all based on 'shade' or distant connection to Africa. There are people 'whites' consider 'black' whom other black people do not. 'Black' is a very unscientific term...and is, was, simply a convient way to classify a whole group of peoples who are not 'white'. (which to is a generic term). Second...how is it Obamas fault that those who hire are choosing not to hire 'blacks'? Or maybe these so called generic 'blacks' aren't applying for jobs to begin with. There's to many factors here. Skill set, motivation, lack of training and or maybe even discrimination. But all that aside, what does Laura. I. expect the President to do about it?, reinstate affirmative action??? If Conservatives are so concerned about blacks being unemployed, than why don't they start hiring them? (they could care the less, and under Conservative President would simply say 'blacks lack motivation', but under Obama, somehow it's the Presidents duty to get them hired). Totally inconsistent. Politics does that though, makes people inconsistent. Bottom line, I think people who want to work are, and those who don't aren't...regardless of color. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 25, 2015 15:27:49 GMT -5
Two Cosmetically beautiful younger 'white women' shot by deranged gun man in Louisiana theater, and talk show hostess Laura Ingraham takes rage out on 'The left' right away on her show.
Laura, the talk show hostess, immediately launches in on tirade against 'The left' and 'gun control proponents' even though up until she brought it up I never heard anyone talking about gun control.
It's weird how these talk radio hosts invent 'The Left' and then fill in imaginary words for 'The left'...like a doll or something.
(Hi, Hello, I'm The Left, how are you?)
Like what a ventriloquist doll handler does on stage, puts words into a imaginary dolls mouth.
It's like 'The Left' is the doll and the talk radio hosts are the ventriloquists putting words in the dolls mouth.
It's never a two way dialogue...and their audience just swallows it, gulps it down, instead of maybe wondering if they're being played.
In my whole life I've never really met this homogenous group known as 'The Left'.
I have met individual people with their own unique ideas and view points, but I've never met large blocks of people anywhere that represent 'The left' the way talk radio hosts speak about it.
Back to tragedy..the shooter was a mentally unstable anti Government Nazi flag flying older male.
The shooter wasn't apart of any political ideology Laura normally demonizes on her show.
His attack on those two women had nothing to do with 'The Left' or any registered Democrat or the President or any other thing talk radio hosts like to blame things on.
Yet Laura was more upset at the ventriloquist doll known as 'The Left' than the actually shooter himself.
Nor did she express sadness for the two women who died, instead went right into tirade against 'The Left'.
And no one in her audience questioned that, they all just went along with it, all playing with the lifeless ventriloquist doll known as 'the left', moving it's lips and making it say this or that and other things to make audience more upset.
Talk radio is nothing more than ratings driven trickery...maybe one day more people will figure that out.
Issues I care about, talk radio hosts though...that's a whole different circus tent.
 |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 25, 2015 17:01:06 GMT -5
Meet 'The Left' Yes, this is the left, comes straight from the minds of talk radio and Fox News (some on Fox aren't under that spell, I'll point out a few on Fox that actually think for themselves time allowing) Common phrases often artificially fed into the ventriloquists dolls mouth by talk radio hosts and Fox commentators. 1. The left all hate Donald Trump 2. The left is destroying this country 3. The left is for everything immoral and corrupt 4. The left wants radical Islam to take over the world 5. The left wants to take away your guns 6. The left loves to kill babies 7. The left wants felons in jail, prison, to vote, cause those in prison are also 'The Left' 8. The left loves illegal immigration and wants America over ran with violent leftist criminals from Mexico 9. The left hates everything that is proper and decent 10. The left wants to take from the rich and give to the poor (But notice how when the supposed 'right' is in power, same exact things occur, are progressed, legislated?)And I could go on and on with how 'The left' is demonized by talk radio and Fox. Rush will go on for hours artificially inserting, creating fictitious dialogue for 'The left'...but never has on any guests to offer counter point. But he'll sit there and put words in peoples mouths, then spend next 3 hours smearing the hell out of another's character. Kind of what insane people do...you know, the whole 'voices in the head thing'. Rational people, fair people, honest people are always open to two way dialogue. It's all a sham. Why do you think nothing ever changes? Ted Cruz (whom I thought I didn't like) spoke some hard truth on Friday that the zone has know forever, and has shared. But it took a Senator saying it to ruffle some feathers, and that is this whole 'left vs right' thing is a sham and only benefits a certain power circle at the top. And talk radio hosts do their listeners a big disservice by not telling the truth about how things really work and who or what 'The left' really is. For if you ever found out you might be surprised. But it's better talk radio hosts keep you dumb (they need you to be dumb in order to create audience for ratings which means revenue). Talk radio shows are nothing more than over glorified info mercials...the kind you see on Cable TV that annoy the hell out of you, always pitching vitamins.   Sadly like this guys products (this guy was busted for defrauding people) Sadly like this guys products, commercialized 'Conservatism' has become nothing more than another market that is making many rich, keeping you stupid, and allowing nothing you care about to change. The zone is never wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Sept 2, 2015 17:27:26 GMT -5
Laura Ingraham's radio audience not very bright when it comes to Government office and religious freedom, as todays show revealedI knew talk radio audiences were kind of dense, at least the callers screener allows through, but today just kind of took the cake. They're either dense, or deliberately being dishonest for the sake of appearing right. Neither is good. Let's get to the point. Kentucky Government employed clerk refuses to issue marriage license to gay couplelink to story hereSorry but this issue is pretty cut and dry to me, and has nothing to do with 'religious freedom'. One cannot hold office, represent a State sanctioned position, and then impose personal religious beliefs on the general public. The State is a spiritually neutral entity, the State structure is basically there to collect taxes in various ways, and the fee to a marriage license is one of those ways, irregardless to whom is getting married as long as the law defines it as marriage. The State is basically a lifeless structure put into place to collect revenue from the people within it's boundaries for self sustainability and to provide basic services. When that lady, Kim Davis, is at work, employed by the State, that's whom she's suppose to represent, without bias. Her job is to represent the State, collect fees and taxes, not to preach to others about morality, not while on the clock. If she wants to preach to others about morality, her version of it, than she can do so when not on the clock being paid by tax payers, which includes gay people. Her religious freedoms are not being attacked, rather she's using wrong forum in which to express it. And if she fails to understand that, than she fails to understand why America was formed, to get away from the religious tyranny of the Roman Church in Europe  Which like ISIS today, and other middle Eastern nations, combine Government with religion = Iran. America is not Iran. What if next clerk of the County is a Muslim who refuses to marry Christian couples?What if the next clerk of the County is a Muslim who refuses to see the validity in Christian marriages and refuses to issue marriage licenses to Christian or Atheist couples? Is that what we want? How can people be so blind and short sighted? Or what if next County clerk is a Atheist who only decides to issue marriage licenses to other Atheist couples? That's the precedent that this lady is setting! That anyone with any particular view point can use the County or State office to impose their particular belief or doctrine on general public, than we'd have chaos. My verdict is whether or not I agree with gay marriage, I have to side with the gay couples on this one. The State is not the Church. If the woman wants to oppose gay marriage, she can do it when not wearing title of County clerk. And one more thing, a caller called into Laura Ingraham's show today and wondered what was the difference between Mohammad Ali's religious objection to being drafted into Vietnam and Kim Davis's refusal to serve gay marriage licenses? .jpg) Big big difference, first off Ali did go to jail, served time in prison for his refusal to join the Army. Second, Mohammad Ali was not representing the State, he did not hold a State office, he was a private citizen, thus his refusal to serve on religious grounds only affected him. And if Laura's audience can't see the difference, than they're dumber than I thought. Worse, if Laura Ingraham herself can't see the difference, than.. 1. She's plays deliberately dumb simply to prod more people to call. 2. Like other ratings driven talk show hosts, has little respect for their listeners, and plays on their own stupidity simply to keep conversation going. As educated as Laura I is, and all her legal history, herself clerking for powerful politicians, I know she knows better, and not sure why radio hosts deliberately allow callers, audience, to wonder in the desert of ignorance. Me myself...can't stand dishonesty, would rather have someone correct me, than to lead me down wrong path just to keep me listening to their show.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Sept 2, 2015 20:56:23 GMT -5
Continued from above.
Not only that but what if next clerk of County is a Muslim or Wiccan or Atheist who refuses to issue marriage licenses to others not of their belief?
What if next clerk of County is a voodoo doctor, as their chosen religion, and refuses to issue marriage licenses to anyone who isn't into voodoo?
Point being the State, or person working State job, should not be in the business of preaching morality to citizens, not from office of assigned duties.
That sets a real bad precedent down the road.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Sept 12, 2015 10:40:21 GMT -5
I don't agree with talk radio tactics radio hosts use just to generate listenership and call ins from dumb audience. But one thing I do agree with radio host Laura I' on is how odd it was for Dr Ben Carson to suddenly and without warning, turn on Donald Trump. A totally unprovoked verbal attack. I smell donor class hereWhen candidates suddenly and unexpectedly do things out of context, that's out of line of their character that means donor class has coma a callenIn other words, like Trump has been saying all this time, sooner or later you have to pay the donor class, lobbyist, sooner or later you must pay the reaper. Like Trump has been saying, these other candidates are financed by a lot of 'super pack' (mysterious money) from shady (in my opinion) organizations that have interests that differ from normal working class citizens, and when they come a calling, the candidates had better answer and do as they say. Kind of like that one sci-fi movie 'Divergent'  Where society is broken up into different groups, and in this particular group they trained, and were allowed to have individual personality traits and interests up to a certain point, and then after that were injected with some type of mind control substance which made them totally obedient to ruling class. Same thing occurs with politicians, and why it's all a sham, a scary nightmarish sham. If anyone still thinks politicians go up to D.C. to fight for 'small time values and ethics', or to fight for 'The Constitution' (As dense headed Glenn Beck seems to suggest), than such individuals are living in La La land. From this point forward you will start seeing politicians act out in ways that go against their character, and the reason is from this point forward they're under the strings of the donor class, globalist, and will take aim at Trump. Trump, thus far, is still his own man, as such is a big threat to his own admitted former donor class colleagues. I've picked on Laura Ingraham's show a lot in the past, will in the future, but one thing I do think she's spot on about is Immigration, and Trump, or properly analyzing his campaign and other candidates response to it. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Sept 26, 2015 11:26:32 GMT -5
Laura struggles with Catholic faith of salvation and geo politic smear politics I know you struggle between the glitz and recognition of geo political politics, and DNA based destiny and prestige, but you became a Catholic for a reason, first and foremost you believe in salvation from God, Jesus, you believe there's an after life. Right now your feet is in both doors, one pays a living for you, the other does not. Salvation for all isn't a very popular message within the geo political secular world. This is the Twilight Zone, as such you'll only get honest and true assessment, not popular secular based opinion.. Don't ever shun your Catholic faith, your faith in Jesus and salvation for the sake of colleague praise. Politics is dead, once we die, salvation, eternal salvation lives on. Make up your mind. much more to follow. You need guidance.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 7, 2015 18:43:36 GMT -5
Lately I'm impressed with Laura Ingraham's radio show and commentaryLately I'm becoming more impressed with Laura I, radio show. When she drops the whole fake 'left vs right' façade, she's actually a delight to listen to, and properly identifies the issues this nation faces. Lately I've been really impressed with her radio show as she takes on more of a populist, nationalistic, tone. I like that. And love the way she's finally telling audience about how most politicians aren't looking out for them or small town issues when they go to DC, but rather they're looking out for their own bottom line. Sadly money, power and prestige rules this world, not small town ethics. Small town ethics is a battle individual people or citizens must fight on their own, but don't expect Senators and Congressmen to fight that battle for you anymore, not in the year 2015 anyways, those days are sadly gone. Laura I, has been very honest lately with her audience, and her un official support of Trump. She, like many others, realize that Trump is the only candidate who's properly identifying the issues that are effecting this nations ability to stay on top. All the other candidates talk a good game, but once on the field don't play it.  Once elected and actually on the field, they're about nothing but fancy symbolic speeches, and nothing more. So what if they know and can quote the Constitution and quote historic figures, it's all meaningless if they're owned by powerful lobbyist who control them. Keep up the good work on your show Laura, I enjoy your radio show as of lately, accept when you revert back to the whole 'The Left' blame game, when intelligent people know the destruction of this country has nothing to do with sandal wearing 'leftist' riding their bikes up and down the streets of San Francisco.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 10, 2015 19:08:12 GMT -5
Why not just scream out loud 'White Power!, you'll feel better rather than being in the closet about it Yet another media conservative who must feed meat to their audience by automatically excusing the behavior of 'racists', yet condemning the tuition paying students right to react to it. So typical. Hey Laura, step out the closet and just let your base DNA molecular instincts (influenced by up bringing, time, place and era)(all totally random) just let your instincts scream out... 'White Power!' I mean stop allowing 'foot soldiers' to face blunt of racism charge, while closet DNA racist like yourself hide your racism behind intellectualism and education. I mean if you're going to sit here and blame, demonize, 18-23 year old college students for pushing back against those who are allowing campus climate that allows racist people to call them names, paint swastikas, than just scream out 'white power', and you'll feel better. No condemnation of the people who agitated the students, they get a pass from talk radio conservatives, but yet, like a predictable ratings driven template, automatically condemn black students who desire a less hostile campus to study on. I'm sorry, but to me Conservatism doesn't mean automatically always taking the side of racist, excusing their behavior, while automatically condemning those who stand against it, want dignity, as being bad. I appreciate the Klan and their blunt racism over the closet racism of media conservatives who cloak their bigotry behind intellectualism.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 20, 2015 11:11:43 GMT -5
Even poll on CNN, viewers were 53% against Syrian refugees coming into States nowBut according to commercialized conservatism, which has to create artificial divisions in order to have relevancy, ' All liberals and the left are scum bags and want nation over ran by illegal Immigrants, and hate the police and are gay'...  Great fiction novel maybe, but not reality, something talk radio hosts don't know about, or do, but don't share with audience in fear of next radio host getting better ratings. So it's easier for all of them to scream out. 'All Republicans goooood and every single Liberal under the moon baaaaad'That just sells better. But in reality there's no way to scientifically categorize people into either group. There are some leather jacket wearing bikers who smoke cocaine, fornicate, rob and steal, but if they simply hate President, are 'pro white' and vote Rep, than they're considered ' conservative by talk radio hosts. Or you could have someone who's gayish, but clean, never has sox, lives a responsible life, biblical life, but refuses to bash President simply for show, and same radio host (and their brainwashed listeners) would call them 'A liberaaaaal') And I could go on and on. It's all a farse. Being Holy doesn't come from either party and isn't developed in either party. If people think they're going to find 'Holy' within politics, than they've been deceived. Back to original point. Talk radio hosts invent partisan lines within general public where none exist. Most people just have common sense, which originates from other sources than politics. Talk radio hosts depend on their viewers being dumb, in order to maintain relevance in their listeners life.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 3, 2016 18:19:36 GMT -5
Strange political bed fellasI've been hard on Laura I, in the past on here, but lately, since Donald Trump started his campaign, she sounds less like typical ratings driven partisan rhetorical machine, and more like a person with common sense. In fact I'd say of all national talk radio show, Laura Ingraham 'gets it', more so than all of them, when it comes to national sovereignty, and protecting the lives and dignity of Americans, all Americans. Not sure why she couldn't convey this before Trumps started his campaign. Before Trumps campaign it was always the usual 'All Republicans gooood, and every single Democrat under the sun baaaaad'While in the meantime both party's were collaborating behind the scenes working for their donors and sponsors. It's why nothing ever got done in D.C., it's why no matter how many Reps were elected and held seats, seemed the 'Liberaaaaal' agenda always prevailed. I've always known that to be sumicious, and a convenient way for some to profit by creating false divide between people by using polarizing partisan labels. Well then here comes Trump, who simply tore down all the stage curtains and exposed all! Trump tore down the curtains and exposed all the actors and players in the back, and now they're scrambling to put the curtains back up. These curtains will only remain down and torn for a short while, if Trump looses campaign the curtains will go back up and show will go on. Laura gets this. And I've been impressed with her shows as of lately. When she sets aside the whole right vs left template, and just speaks from the heart, she's not a bad person at all. But I know in the end she's still a radio host and that in the end to stay relevant in that industry your must attack invented enemies. But for now, at least when it comes to Trump, she's singing my tune.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 8, 2016 17:24:54 GMT -5
Strange relationship with Laura I, the radio hostAt times, when talking about non Trump issues, she annoys me, yet when only focused on Trump, and future of nation, her words are like music to my ears. She 'gets it'... I'm just not sure why outside of Trump, I don't always agree with her view points...oh well, who cares. Trump has created strange bed fellows, or fellahs, or fellahs or whatever. In that many who normally would be at each others throats, for whatever reasons, have come together and are united, with each other, when it comes to our support for Trump.Trump has managed to create a odd coalition of 'bed fellows', people who normally might not see eye to eye on social issues or viewpoints, but citizens none the less who want to preserve nation 'As Is'...  Laura Ingraham appeals to me for that reason, she, like myself, wants to preserve this nations 'As Is'... Law and order, Judeo/Christian foundation, and prosperity first and foremost for native born citizens. Me and Laura see totally eye to eye on that. And of course over all freedom and tradition...to include Xmas, Halloween, Easter ect...  Yes, me and Laura both value, and cherish our American traditions and don't want them destroyed by 3rd world types, or even odd ball Secular types who delight in destroying our past! I love and want all my holidays to stay 'as is' and intact. I may disagree with Ingraham on certain social issues, or methods, but that's because we have different social experiences growing up, but none the less I agree with her on wanting to preserve this nation 'as is'. And to stop allowing globalist to suck the fiscal life out of it's people, lowering wages, and turning us into mindless zombie labor waged populace who's only purpose is to enrich global interests. Laura I is on of the few radio hosts who logically fight for the same principles Trump is trying to enact on nation. Trumps not the best orator, his own mouth is his biggest enemy, but Laura then comes on following day and superbly explains what Trump meant to say using more artful word placement. And for that I thank her. Even though in past have spanked her. But she's no threat to me. As Americans we're allowed to be different, have different viewpoints, that's the whole point of freedom. But if nation is allowed to dissolve, than the point of any of the above will have all been lost.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 22, 2016 21:42:29 GMT -5
Time to spank Laura I real quick First off Laura... The stupidest question in the world which I wish you'd stop repeating like a robot is... 'Are you doing better now than you were 7 1/2 years ago?'That's the dumbest most condescending question ever! First off, are you doing better or worse?...your answer would be you're doing better!! So what makes you think others aren't? Don't insult us. Common sense conservative types know, realize, that how we're doing not now or ever depends on elected President but rather our own individual decisions we make in own lives. There are 100 factors that effect peoples lives before any Presidential policy touches most. Relationships, bosses, work place personalities, family on and on. People who wait around for any elected President to effect their outcome in life are very dense and are the very types you normally scorn! Quit playing us like we're fools Laura...you're smarter than that, so if smart, yet still ask such a partisan questions means you're being dishonest...stop it babe. I have hope for you yet, after all you do support Trump.
|
|
