|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 29, 2015 6:03:53 GMT -5
Last nights debate showed me why ultimately you really have to put your faith in something higher than man to derive meaning and purpose in this brief existence
I did not watch the debates, but watched the reaction to it afterwards by both the candidates and news, I mean entertainment media.
I was disappointed in both.
The candidates came of as whiney little immature spoiled middle school adults, and the personalities who covered them in the media came off as 'stuck on stupid'.
I don't think the media favors either side, either party, I observe those in the media truly are detached from reality, exist in a alternate Universe or something, and are fueled by their own sense of importance.
It's why night after night, panel after panel, is always composed of the same talking heads, feeding off of their own relevance and importance to viewers.
They don't listen, and are obviously insulated from the opinion and views of millions of their fellow citizens.
In fact I don't even think those who work in the media see themselves as citizens of any nation.
It's as if they see themselves as diplomats, immune from the views and ways and realities of those around them.
I don't think they're even trying to be 'partisan'.
I haven't the wording for it now, but it's as if they truly have the mindset of little hobbits who truly are clueless.
In other words in their own minds they think they're doing what they're suppose to do.
In other words they are what they are, a leopard is a leopard, and to expect a leopard to behave like a rabbit is fool hearty, it's not going to happen.
News and entertainment are so merged into one now, that I'm dumbfounded that GOP candidates ever expect anything else.
Instead of whining and crying about it, pouting about it, if they were smart, keen and clever, they'd simply use it to their advantage.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 29, 2015 9:15:36 GMT -5
Can't stand whinersCan't stand so called Conservatives on radio, TV, their callers, who whine. Heartland Conservatism doesn't whine, just rises up and conquers.. After debates all you hear now is Candidates and their followers, and talk radio callers, hosts ect, all they're doing is whining like little hobbits, that really turns me and a lot of others off. Blame and whine... 'Oh it's all the main stream medias falt'
Oh it's the liberal medias fault...whine whine...
Oh the media is in bed with the Democrats, whine whine whine...'You know what just.... 
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 29, 2015 15:31:24 GMT -5
Unlike Savage, Hannity and other talk radio hacks who provide cover for do nothing candidates, in the zone you only get true assessment
Today is 'whine' day for hack, TV/Media/entertainment brand of conservatism.
Today is the day they have been and get to blame all the nations wohs on 'the media'...bs.
the so called 'Media' has been a smoke screen for hack conservatives forever.
Look, either you get stuff done, say what you have to say, or you don't, regardless of 'The media'.
And sorry, but in 2015 there is no 'main stream media' anymore!
Hey cry baby candidates, if you don't like question you're asked, than don't answer it and or change it into a question of your liking.
But don't sit there and blame your failings on adolescent behaving media personal, cause you know what, they're not going to change their stripes for you or anyone else, and if you don't like it, than get out of the game.
Quit hiding your ineffectiveness behind 'the media'.
You've had years to do things right, pass or reverse laws, and didn't, cause you're owned by donors, who send lobbyist to seduce you.
You're fake 'Oh the liberal media is to blame for everything' fake act doesn't work here, not in the zone.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 29, 2015 21:42:37 GMT -5
People who switch from one candidate to another over one sound bite on stage are hyper dense to meSorry, but anyone who changes allegiance over one candidate to another over one stage sound bite are hyper dense to me.  Duh...
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 3, 2015 8:55:45 GMT -5
Outside of Trump, Carson, and possibly maybe Ted Cruz, all candidates will have generic Presidency if elected Outside of Trump, maybe Carson, and possibly Ted Cruz, if any other candidates elected, it will simply be 'business as usual' or a generic Presidency. Outside of Trump and Carson, (And possibly Ted Cruz) they're all owned, bought and paid for. Ye sure, they'll be given a bit of wiggle room to appeal to their 'base', but on matters that actually effect over all direction of nation, none of them have the power to change that, or guts. Donald Trump is actually the only nation changing candidate, all the rest are just sound bite puppets. Not saying they're bad, or don't want to change things, but truth is they simply cannot! Sadly they're all owned, will simply get elected, bicker with opposing party, and that's it...it will make for good ratings driven talk radio chatter, fox news chatter, but that's it. Trump is the only one with enough independent wealth that can work outside the system, the rest are owned by the system, are the system. And Rand Paul treats job as if it's some college Constitutional course, in 2015 none of that matters if there's no nation to practice Constitutional law in. Gigantic sour trade deals that strip U.S. of economic power render all that talk radio Constitutional stuff useless. In 2015 everyone has traded their patriotism in for dollars. Trump is the only one that sees this, can see it, simply cause he's a business person who operates independently of system. He looks at America as if it's his personal bedroom or something, and wants to fix it. The other candidates will simply go up there and fight 'Democrats' in the house, and nothing will get done or change. The stuff they fight over will be meaningless, like to college teams fighting over which team mascot is better. Meaningless. Trump is the last realistic change for true D.C., destiny altering change, all the rest are simply generic candidates that maybe mean well, but will simply be Republican version of President Obama. The Zone is never wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 14, 2015 18:46:33 GMT -5
Totally not interested in Democrat debate or debatesBasically all they're going to say is the following 1. Free food for everyone (not going to happen) 2. Legalize all illegal aliens. 3. Allow and encourage anyone to come into nation by the millions...  4. Climate change must be dealt with. And that's basically it. Nothing inspiring at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 15, 2015 0:31:44 GMT -5
I know it's popular for people to always say
'pray for police, for their safety, cause they're on the front lines'
I don't nessisarily agree with that for the following reasons.
1. private citizens are the ones really on the front lines, cause when terrorist strike, they don't strike armed police departments, instead they strike civilian areas where there are no police.
Same with criminals, when criminals strike they strike unarmed victims, not armed police on patrol.
I mean whens the last time a armed police unit or car on patrol got robbed?
So in reality the casual population is always on the front lines of disaster, and the police respond only after civilians have been struck, or victimized.
The police arrive later, not before, to simple fill out reports, or if situation still active, to bring it to an end.
As I sit here, alone, tonight, I'm totally vulnerable, if something were to happen I don't have lots of weapons at my disposal, like a officer on patrol does, nor do I have access to radio where at push of button I can summon dozens of back up officers with even more weapons, and a helicopter if needed.
So yes, I do appreciate the fact the officers do respond to incidents after someone has already been shot, or beat up, but they're not always 'the front' line unless catching criminals through traffic stops or active bank robbery or similar.
A better solution would be for the Government to simply allow everyone to carry weapons, and to be given the same benefit of the doubt officers are given when defending selves without being dragged to court and having life ruined.
Added: Also serving warrants can be considered 'front line work', and can be very dangerous for officers.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 16, 2015 17:52:03 GMT -5
Sorry, not a dense headed, full of led bricks headed, typical Fox or talk radio type plastic conservative
And to that point...this media conservative obsession over President not calling violent criminals 'radical Islam' I could care the less.
To me it's behavior, actions, that make one a threat, not names or labels.
It's not illegal to be Christian or Conservative, nor is it illegal to be a Nazi or Islam.
Even being radical Islam is not illegal, or radical right wing extremist.
What is illegal and requires military or police response is when people commit acts of violence against others,
It's the actions you blow up and destroy, not the ideology.
Just like China can't just say, 'Lets bomb, destroy, all Conservative Americans who believe in gun rights'.
If you have your believe, but haven't done anything wrong, than why should you be targeted?
At least under U.S. rules.
I think it's near retarded for people to some how think that you cant' combat criminal acts, unless you call it 'radical Islam'.
That's very kinder gardenish to me.
It's behavior and action that missiles go after, not ideology.
If we start outlawing ideology, than many people, groups could be targeted for liquidation just based on belief.
Again, if you want stupid, follow Fox or Hannity or Savage or Rush, but if you want honest and common sense, than keep reading.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 17, 2015 23:49:45 GMT -5
Sadly, I don't think ISIS will ever go away.
I mean since they're a Stateless organization, all they'll do if facing insurmountable odds of defeat, is lay down weapons and blend back into general population, the way Saddam's Army did, and then when times right, re emerge as something else.
Hibernate, groups like ISIS simply hibernate when odds against them, then re emerge later, they simply continue to morph, change surface appearance, evolve.
I don't think any elected Republican will have any better luck with this.
Saddam was an easy foe to conquer cause Saddam played by the rules, ISIS does not.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 18, 2015 10:20:01 GMT -5
The President is now working against my interests
I'm not a Fox News, talk radio, hate the President no matter what 'bot'.
I'm a practicalist (or however it's spelled).
And right now, the President is working against my interest.
1. Has, is, wants to release hundreds of drug dealers back into the streets.
Where are they going to live?, what type of people will they once again attract to themselves once out?
2. Wants to import even more immigrants from Syria and elsewhere.
a. And people wonder why unemployment won't drop
b. Gov can't pay for social security, or give recipients of it a increase, but can afford, is willing to pay for free housing, food, medical (tax payers paying) for 10's of 1000's of new immigrants?
And this will go on for years, maybe decades, cause where will they work?
The President is going a bit or a lot wacky right now.
His vision of what America is and mine are different.
But again I don't 'hate' the President, I just question his judgment.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 20, 2015 11:39:24 GMT -5
Don't like whenI don't like when I hear commentators or politicians on TV say 'We are a compassionate nation and love taking in immigrants'... Hmm, who does?, common people or Government agencies? It's the Government that brings in boat loads, train loads and plane loads of people, not the citizens of U.S. The individual citizens of the U.S. have absolutely no say in this process, rather immigrants are simply dumped into areas, regions, of nation by order of secret mysterious Government forces. So to me it's not genuine to say American people love immigrants, have big hearts, and want more, when it's not the average American citizen that makes these decisions, rather it's the Gov that does, who never bothers to ask people if it's what they want or not. Common sense here folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 23, 2015 19:37:42 GMT -5
If there's no moral principles behind politics, than what's the point?
Evil tactics and ways don't suddenly become 'good' simply cause evil tactics and ways are perceived to be on your side.
What I mean by that is if you close your eyes, and substitute the name of President Obama with the name of former President Bush, the Fox news crowd, talk radio crowd, sound exactly as the Democrats sounded under Bush, constant, senseless bashing just to bash type of sentiment.
Partisan bickering gone amuck.
I'm not now, nor have I ever been about that.
I will always put common sense, honest and decency before politics, and if politics starts making me compromise my biblically based senses, than I'll learn towards the spirit every time.
I don't believe in smearing President just to smear him, repeat lies about what he is or isn't doing against ISIS just to make him, or those in the service, look bad.
To do so would be being dishonest, and dishonesty is a trait of the devil, not a divine God.
Talk radio hosts, Fox, angry sentiment ect, are not my moral compasses.
If I had no principles, I could sit here and bash the President all day and night, like Fox, just for effect, but I don't, cause it wouldn't be right or honest, and cause I know better.
For instance, the President didn't 'lie' when he said 'ISIS' was contained', then a day later a foreign cell away from Syria and Iraq attacked France.
An honest person knows that no power in the world can control what any one of millions can decide to do at any given time.
If God can't stop all evil acts, it's dishonest for those who claim to believe in God, to suggest President Obama can, or any President.
And by whining like this all the time, all people are doing is setting themselves up for when next GOP gets into office and Terrorist decide to unleash another 911 attack, like under Bush.
Then it will be the Democrats turn to start smearing Rep President, and Rep's turn to spend the next year defending him.
And round and round we go, it's senseless.
And I refuse to get caught up in meaningless, senseless immoral bashing of others just for effect.
It just feels evil to me, seems more and more people are becoming evil again, and justifying the evil using politics or religion as a justifiable platform.
I just can't be apart of it.
Politics is really proving to be the devils religion.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 23, 2015 21:28:02 GMT -5
President right on this one, in that media is making superstars of ISIS, and it's membersA common sense person can already see this, has seen it, and can come to this conclusion with or without the President just so happening to state, or warn, against same effect. It's the same reason why after mass shootings in U.S. now, many officers refuse to use name of perpetrator as to not give them more notoriety than needed. (This is what I mean about how politics makes people dishonest on purpose). Now how come this principle is understood on Fox, talk radio, on some occasions, but not others? Politics, that's why, where as I don't play that game. And sorry, but it's clear and evident that for last 2 weeks, 24 hours a day, on Fox, CNN, ABC news, PBS news hour, MSNBC and any other national news show, that all they're doing is making superstars, rock stars, out of ISIS by airing them, or related stories none stop! And notice they never show ISIS in defeated posture, they're instead always showing ISIS on the offense, holding up weapons in celebratory stances.  They always look victories, and all the media does is bombard viewers with celebratory images of ISIS 24 freagan hours a day, non stop. The best recruitment commercial ISIS and other groups, could ever ask for, and all for free! Free add time given to terrorist by networks that simply want ratings, and then of Fox, pretend they're doing it out of concern for you...ye ok. Cannot people see what's going on? Cannot people step aside from politics for a minute to see what's going on? How both sides are constantly feeding each other. To me, being a conservative doesn't mean always blindly following political rhetoric of others, just to seem popular, or just to feed into own bias, or the bias of others. Conservatism shouldn't even be linked to electoral politics, as far as I'm concern, cause electoral politics has contaminated Conservatism.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 28, 2015 20:22:16 GMT -5
Citizens are first line of defense, not Police officersSorry, know this isn't popular to say this, but again you don't come here for popular ratings driven dribble, you come here for the common sense. And common sense + reality, tells people of reason that it's actually citizens, you and me, who are the first line of defense, not police officers.  Examples If someone broke into your home right now, where are the police?? If someone jumps you while walking down the sidewalk at night, where are the police? When someone steals property from your garage, where are the police?? Answer.. They're out patrolling. Police aren't our personal body guards. Mostly police show up after crime has been committed to take report. Then if deemed important enough, or you important enough or rich enough, detectives will follow up with an investigation. Crimes are committed, people are shot, robbed, raped, abused, then police show up after act has been committed. Right or wrong?? So in actuality you are the front line of defense. And if State would deputize all citizens, cops would hardly even be needed. There are lots of would be hero's out here who don't need State badges to be 'hero's' or to do the right thing, but sadly most States, the Government, frown heavily on self protection. Cops do a important job when they serve warrants, pull over vehicles and randomly discover person they pulled over is criminal, and or when they respond to mass shootings. But if laws allowed average citizens to do the same, cops would hardly, if ever, be needed. And that's just the truth. Sorry I don't pump you up with usually fake phony Fox News, talk radio police worship type of rhetoric. Cops, some, are cool, but so are many average citizens. 
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Dec 3, 2015 0:08:57 GMT -5
Once again, hundreds of cops, law enforcement, show up after people already dead
Once again the police, hundreds of them, from all sorts of departments, show up after people, victims, already dead and shot up..
Two shooters command the attention of half the County resources...what if there were 4 or 5 or 10, acting from different locations, then what?
My point is I get sick of hearing this cop worship dribble come from Fox and talk radio hosts, when they always show up not before, but after people, victims, already shot up and dead.
Quite frankly, if the laws of the land allowed for more citizen groups, and or encouraged more people (responsible people) to carry their own fire arms, cross bows ect, than a lot of this would not take place.
Citizens, not the police, are the first line of defense and casualties
This idea that cops are the only brave ones, the only ones allowed to be hero's, is a farse, a lie.
Truth is many would love to be their own hero's to their own communities, neighbors, but do to laws restricting guns, they simply cannot.
Police are simply licensed hero's, licensed to be hero's by the State.
If allowed, believe me you there are many vigilanti groups that would of loved to hunt down those suspects, if allowed to.
And could of done so with a lot less resources.
Even some gangs could of gotten at them quicker, if allowed to by they law.
So I reject this idea that after every mass shooting, after dozens or more killed, then police show up, that I should praise them all the time.
Sorry if that annoys you, but it's the truth, not all of us are duck and run, hide in closet type of uppity protected class types.
A lot of us are more than happy to fight back, just like police do, only difference is they're licensed by State to do so.
If not licensed to be a hero, you'll be arrested yourself for interfering in State hero conduct.
What a farse.
Continued on next page or post
|
|
