|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 15, 2016 20:00:59 GMT -5
Refuse to be held hostage to any parties ideology
Today on Fox, (and on other media Conservative networks, including talk radio), Dick Cheney was asked what he thought about Donald Trumps comments on how George Bush did not keep 'us' safe and 'lied' about WMD.
Dick Cheney's response was typical of partisan types..
"He sounds like a liberal Democrat, sounds like Michael Moore", ect.
I reject this notion that 'thought', intelligent thought, factual thought, must always be categorized politically.
I think intelligent people can arrive at the same conclusion or conclusions regardless of party affiliation or political intent.
If someone comes to the conclusion that George Bush exaggerated about Saddam harboring WMD, than I think it's their right to be honest about it to themselves first and then to those around them, without feeling they must 'hush hush' simply do to party loyalty.
It's people being dishonest or 'covering up' for party loyalty that makes politics stink to high heaven.
To point out 'sin' in the other party while covering up 'sin' in ones own party, is what's wrong with politics and why politics stink.
This idea that all thought must conveniently fit into some pre cast political slot, is one I reject.
And such thinking only leads to corruption, moral corruption.
Principle and honesty should come before party loyalty or affiliation, otherwise the mentality becomes 'gang' like or tribal, where you disagree with the other side simply because they're the other side.
It's gotten so bad that if Michael Moore or Obama agree that 2+2=4, the GOP will disagree just to disagree, not because disagreeing is good for the country, but rather good for party.
And this works both ways.
Disagree with someone cause they're wrong, not just because their of a different political party.
You come here for common sense, not ratings driven divisive rhetoric.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 18, 2016 16:57:10 GMT -5
I side with Apple I side with Apple on this latest incident of FBI wanting the back door key into all Apple products, to include cell phones. I'm not a politician, or talk radio host, so I don't have to say what's popular to dupe any fans, voters or listeners I may have, Instead I'm free to just speak common sense without any partisan leaning. As such I do not want, nor trust, any Government agency having any back door codes to infiltrate devices we all use to transmit info to one another, whether personal or business..why not? 1. Government employees don't stay Government employees forever, and once 'fired' or leave office or position, they are then free to take 'knowledge' with them and apply it as they see fit, either in a business, or 'sell it' or for malicious reasons. I think that's to much information for people to know or have in regards to violating our privacy. And all these crazy fake phony talk radio hosts and politicians screaming at Apple to allow the Government access to 'keys', well they're not looking out for common people or of the security of this nation. Remember, politicians use Apple phones to, Marines use them, secret service uses them and more, CIA ect...now if Apple were to create back door to these devices, than like they said, not only good guys can pry, but also bad guys/gals. Wisdom always sees beyond the 'emotional moment'. The same talk radio hacks screaming for Apple to allow Government access to our phones, are the same ones who were condemning Presidnet Obama (or accusing him) of prying on us with the NSA!These same fake media conservative hacks who now scream for Apple to allow Government to spy on all of us, were the same ones accusing President Obama of using NSA to pry on us, so why the flip flop? Talk radio hosts are so inconsistent, and seems the only people screeners allow through are 'dumb' and don't know how to make proper counter points. I hope Apple wins this one cause I don't trust Government employees to do the right thing, cause in the end they're flawed people like everyone else, and in the end such knowledge will be leaked out one way or another, and that's just a historical fact. Go Apple.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 19, 2016 17:58:22 GMT -5
Why people elect who they do, the whole point of voting for the one you want
To me, if I were to vote, the whole point of voting for whom I want is cause Id do so in hopes, confidence and belief that they could actually implement policies they said they could.
Let me just get to the point.
To me it doesn't matter how steeped in the Constitution one is, how educated they are on the Bill or rights, Conservative principles; none of it matters, their personal knowledge, unless they're able to actually accomplish what they say they can.
I'd rather see a candidate elected who can do 3 things out of 10 that they said they were going to do, than one who gets zero out of 10 yet full of constitutional knowledge and Conservative idealism.
Trump vs Cruz?
Who's more likely to accomplish stuff once in office?
What really is Teds vision for the nation, other than attacking Democrats just to attack them?
And what is Trumps vision for nation?
I'm admittedly bias here in that I feel Trump see America as his own personal property, and as such is more likely to protect it's borders, protect it's sovereignty, and protect it's business interests against the world.
Where I see Ted Cruz as just yet another Con vs Lib type of politician, who will spend the majority of their time not fighting foreign threats, but rather fighting other American politicians in the House and Senate.
That gets nothing done, and just creates more gridlock.
Politicians get paid, gridlock or not, the rest of us suffer, will suffer eventually, do to their lack of action.
If I want something done, Trump is the man, but if I just want to elect someone who's smart, can quote the Constitution and cite legalistic law, yet accomplish nothing while in office, than I think Cruz would be that one.
This is a bias post..I must admit that, bias in favor of Trump.
Although I disagree with their stance against Apple computer...
Trump needs to stick to the basics that got him where he is, if he starts drifting to far into social issues his popularity will begin to wane.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 29, 2016 7:18:37 GMT -5
Duh, obviously David Duke was paid to publicly endorse Trump
Stupid talk radio hosts like Bill Bennet and others will spend all day hyping of the David Duke endorsement of Trump that CNN started on their show.
All the media is slime.
But obviously someone paid Duke to do this as a result to smear Trumps campaign...
Now they're just saying Klu Klux Klan, as many younger people didn't know who David Duke was or is, or use to be.
So what, racists or former racists are still American, and yes, even the Klan votes, Aryan nations members vote, Muslims vote, gay people vote, they all vote for someone, so what.
Trumps policies will help all Americans regardless, or fill in the blank with candidate of your choice.
The sun shines on flowers and weeds alike and all plants benefit from the suns nourishments.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 29, 2016 17:24:29 GMT -5
Rush Limbaugh is an establishment mole or plantMore on this later, but he does the bidding for the establishment class, why do you think nothing ever changed under his watch? And if not for Trump running for office Rush Limbaugh would be pushing Marco Rubio or even Jeb. And he supports the very Conservative magazines that denounced Trump (The Review) and other similar publications The Zone is never wrong...more on this later as time allows. Rush is an establishment mole...  'Just keep telling them it's all the Democrats fault Rush, just keep them pacified for us Rush, yep just keep blaming all ills and exploitation of U.S. on them dern Democrats, thanks pal' Not to brag, but what did the Zone tell you way back on Feb 3rd or earlier about Rush? Always days, weeks, months even years ahead of the curb here. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 2, 2016 20:00:17 GMT -5
Candidates should skip next debate!
This supposed last debate, to me, is suicide.
It's a meaningless debate done only for network profit, and I wish all the candidates would skip it.
It will be nothing more than a demoralizing display of the worst behavior in possible future President.
They will all take the emotional bait.
I wish Donald Trump would skip this last debate rather than give Establishment owned Marco Rubio a chance to go sleaze on him.
Rubio's head will be so filled with memorized ugly lines and statements that others will have coached him to say, that in trying to take Trump out, Rubio will ruin his chance to be seen as Presidential, nor would any of Trumps followers ever vote for him after that.
This last debate is a big big mistake, nothing good or positive will come from it, and I really wish all the candidates would skip it, especially Donald Trump, who always seems to fall for the bait.
Trumps ahead and really doesn't need this garbage anymore.
And Ben Carson, the only cool headed one, won't be there anymore to provide a bit of civility, so now all you'll have on that stage is a bunch of hot headed individuals with no one to make them pause and think.
And the moderators, the snakes they are, will be proding them all on to fight one another.
Why can't these candidates see what a mistake, a disaster, this last debate will be for all of them?
Democrats will use it in future to point out their flaws.
This is sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 3, 2016 23:04:52 GMT -5
Disappointed in all the candidates tonight for acting like hobbits on the debate stage (except for John K)(since he got ignored for the most part)
Regardless of who I personally favor in this election, I'm highly disappointed in all the candidates for taking the bait thrown to them by Fox hosts.
I expect more from elected Senators and wish or wished that Trump hadn't of responded to Rubio every time, I mean even I know not to do that when confronted in condescending manner.
Fox made fools of all of them, accept Kasich, and only cause Kasich's not a threat to anyone.
It was a sad night, and hell no I'm not watching O'Reilly or any more Fox after debate crap.
Fox is sick...they will pay in low ratings over the next few months and years.
They, Fox, went to far.
They back stabbed their viewers, loyal viewers who expected them to be allies in this thing (I never liked them), but other who did got back stabbed.
No Democratic debate ever, I mean ever ever got this personal before.
Fox will pay...they pissed off a lot of people tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 6, 2016 10:14:04 GMT -5
Rubio's campaign has hit ceiling, crashing down now Conservatives, the types this section has been railing about long before Trump came onto the scene, who think Rubio is 'conservative' are the very types who are OK with nothing ever getting done. The same types OK with back room tea parties where D.C. elites hold seminars and give lectures about 'Conservatism', yet change nothing. They're allowed to be conservatives, as long as they don't vote that way, is what their donors tell them. Rubio is of that vein, perfect tie and suit and Leave it to Beaver hair cut (oh so cute), but useless to the people who elect him in that once in office has to obey shady world powers and continue to vote their way, while publically blaming it on 'The liberals'. Anyone, whether Rush or Savage or other, who still thinks 'Liberalism' is why nation is in mess they think it's in, if they say that, they're still lying, liberalism has nothing to do with it, contractors do, banks do, global corporations do, global investors do, for every bill passed leaves a trail of money. People are getting rich, and to blame it on 'liberal policies' is absurd and allows Rep politicians an easy way out. Rubio is of that vein. Conservatism is about useless in politics now, what's needed is common sense, love America first, type of administration. China is growing because their leaders are 'nationalist' and Love China first, before they love anything else. Our politicians love prestige first, power second, and then maybe the voters they love, when elections roll around. Rubio also made a Jack azz of himself by insulting Trump on stage during last debate, guy came off as high schoolish, a Senator acting like that just turned many people off. Trump can get away with that cause everyone already knows he's a 'baller', high roller, a Vegas Strip type of guy, Trump can get away with it, but not a quacky acting Senator, and is why his polls have taken a crash as of lately. Rubio was the GOP darling of almost all of the talk radio hosts before campaign began, shows how much they know. In fact every single candidate talk radio hosts like Rush and Beck and Hannity and others, promoted, have all been eliminated from the race! Nough said for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 9, 2016 17:48:51 GMT -5
Cannot Conservatives socialize, party, hang out with those of different political leaning?, or does being conservative mean one has to eat, sleep, breath and socialize only with others who share exact same view, like a religion?
I reject this idea that just because one is, or you're a Conservative, or Lib or Independent, politically, that some how can't socialize with others of different political mindset.
This idea that 'Trump can't be conservative cause he invited Hillary to his wedding'...big deal and so what.
I mean Rush Limbaugh invited Elton John to perform at his wedding.
That logic makes no sense that you have to drag your politics into social and recreational time, unless one sees politics as some kind of religion.
And to me politics is not a religion, and cannot cleanse or save my soul, not now or ever.
Politics though, can help people package ideas in a way that make people want to vote for you or pass this or that law ect.
And that's all politics really is is the packaging of ideas, and then labeling those ideas as Lib, Con, Libertarian or Independent.
I'm sure Trump has invited many people to his parties and weddings over the years, played golf with Rush, and others, hangs out with whomever on both sides of political adds, but common sense people realize those public gatherings weren't him backing them, but rather him trying to gain influence in their world, for business.
If someone's in power, and you donated to them in the past, and you need permits approved to break ground on a building, and if they can speed up the process for you, than why not, the world has always worked like that, even on smaller neighborhood scales, or even at work.
But media, and Trumps opponents make it seem that when Trump donated to campaigns that he was literally endorsing the candidates policies.
Common sense people know that's not the case.
People play dumb on purpose, deliberately love twisting things out of context, and it takes a quick witted person to correct them right there on the spot, not the next day or week.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 9, 2016 20:54:52 GMT -5
Don't understand, never been demonstrated, how 'Ted Cruz Conservatism' is good for anyone, anybody, other than himselfI don't get these old dog conservative types, they bask in the sun at being 'Conservative', well so freagen what, what has that done for nation over past 20 years? All you get is a bunch of old pale men all bragging about how Conservative they are, yet nothing in policy or direction of nation reflects that...  'I'm conservative, no I'm conservative, no I'm more conservative than you' blah blah blah... (all paid by their donors to do nothing and approve bills that hurt America, while dishonest talk radio hosts convently blame it on 'Liberals', what a sham!!) So Ted Cruz is a conservative, so freagen what, in the mean time China continues to out trade us, the world does actually, immigrants continue to flood in and aren't sent back! 10's of 1000's of refugees continue to be flown in from 3rd world, and re settled in Michigan, Wisconsin and other areas in the mid west, and But hey, Ted Cruz is a conservative, so freagen what! People want results now, not freagen ideology!If I want ideology I'll join a church or a cult or some religion, but if I want results I want to elect a competent pragmatic person who gets things done, other than sitting around bragging about how conservative they are while the world continues sucking the air out of nation. Also, to those urged on by crony talk radio hosts to think that working with Democrats is bad idea, than nothing will ever ever get done, and the raping of nation will continue while stupid Conservative vs Liberal politicians continue to stale mate one another, yet some how together always sign and pass these mysterious trade deals or other legistlation created by their sponsors, by-partisan sponsors, these mysterious unelected forces that seem to control both parties behind the scenes. Don't buy into this con vs Lib BS, it's all a pile of crock! And talk radio hosts should be ashamed of themselves for selling this over past 20 years! It's nothing more than a smoke screen, and people sense that now, and is why Trump is resignating with so many. If Teds elected, it will simply be more of the nothing gets done, deficits rise, bad trade deals, refugee and immigrant dumping into mid west, talk radio hosts continuing to blame all the worlds problems on 'liberals', sanctuary cities continuing, crime and drugs rising, same o same o, but at least dense people can take comfort that Ted is a Conservative, if elected. Nothing would change or get done, but at least he's a 'Conservative'...duh. I vetoed this bill, I vetoed that bill, he would say, yet nothing would change, nothing would get done. And the nation will mysteriously continue to move 'left', until the voting block so changed that no Rep ever able to get elected ever again.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 12, 2016 17:19:13 GMT -5
Common sense and honesty applied to recent Donald Trump rallies1. Trump cannot control the behavior of others, just like President Obama can't control the behavior of others. 2. 1st Amendment doesn't apply to privately held event. It would be like you or I holding private Birthday party inside home or rented garage, and strangers from the outside came crashing in and disrupting the place. Kicking them out is not depriving them of their 1st amendment right to protest, they can do that on public property, but not inside some ones private, rented home ect. 1st amendment is one of the most misused or misapplied amendment of them all and applied to Government actions against peaceful assembly, not whether or not you can crash some ones private birthday party and demand to speak, that's called Trespassing...  3. Don't assume it's 'The Left' or 'Democrats' who are hiring these professional protesters, don't be shocked to find out it's members of the RNC, Establishment class who will try and do anything to derail Trumps nomination. There are many in GOP establishment who have more hatred and disdain for Trump than do those on the casual or social left, many of which are still undecided on who to vote for. 4. Trump is not spewing rhetoric, as many pundents and CNN/Fox News hosts and guests keep saying, he's simply telling supporters what he'll do if elected, just like any other candidate. Trump is no more rhetorical than Hillary or Bernie are by promising to provide all things free to everyone if elected. The following is policy, not rhetoric 1. Secure border, build a wall...policy not rhetoric 2. Stop flow of illegal drugs from spilling over, policy not rhetoric 3. Get tougher on ISIS, policy not rhetoric 4. Islam, as practiced over seas, and those who adhere to it generally despise America and Americans...  It's fact, not rhetoric that Islam, as practiced over seas, produces very hostile anti American converts. 5. Wanting to make America, and the Americans in it, prosperous again, is policy, not rhetoric And I could go on and on, and people responding positively to such policy are not doing so cause they're 'racist', their doing so because Trumps vision makes them optimistic and joyful. Any common sense honest person can see it's the protesters that are being vile, cursing, flipping people off as escorted out, assaulting audience, and even trying to assault Trump today, they're the ones who are behaving in vile oppressive manner, regardless of if hired to do so or acting as lone wolves. Bernie is the one who's twisted by propping up 'blacks' suddenly behind him when he give speeches. Trump is natural and honest, whoever is behind him is behind him, first come, first seated, Trump doesn't attempt to 'color' or 'flavor' his back drop by installing tall, dark skinned African American men and women who'll stand out on news coverage. And is why people like Trump, cause he's not about those kind of games. All are welcome at Trumps rallies, if blacks or others aren't there, it's cause they don't want to be, not cause they're not welcome. Or he could do like Hillary and Bernie and plant 2-5 blacks behind him, like a billboard or something, to give impression his rallies are 'diverse'. Kasich, good man, I like the man as a cabinet member, but not as President cause he's far to 'Liberal' when it comes to immigration, and like Ann Coulter says, it all starts and end with immigration. For once demographic changes, voting will no longer matter, and then only a matter of time before nation breaks up into provinces like Canada. Hmm...maybe that's not such a bad idea, provinces...I will continue next with that thought on future post.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 13, 2016 17:45:38 GMT -5
Common sense tells me that not every person or politician I disagree with is Hitler Reagan was Hitler, Bush Jr was Hitler, P-Obama is suppose to be Hitler, according to Glenn Beck, and now also according to Glenn Beck Donald Trump is Hitler.. I mean come on, just how many incarnations of Hitler are there? .
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 14, 2016 21:33:27 GMT -5
Talk radio hosts still totally discuss me, even though I like Trumps message
Talk radio hosts are still slimy to me, after all they were the ones supporting the very ones they're now calling 'The establishment'...
Who do you think earned millions over the last 30 years propping up the establishment...talk radio hosts!
Now, hosts like Hannity and others, use the word 'establishment' only after others properly identified the problem do to the rise of Trump.
If Trump wasn't running in this race, who the heck do you all think these talk radio hosts would be shoving down your throats!
Rubio was their love puppy, and others who have long since dropped out of race after Trump exposed them.
Yet now these talk radio parasites, for ratings and cred with their audience, want to pretend that they started this movement.
And their divisive message still stinks, Hannity, all of them.
They're still not with it, and still see this as a fight of 'the left' against 'the right', and Obama bashing, all the crap that gave them ratings amongst the gulable over the decades.
They still use that 'two wrongs makes my guy right' type of immoral logic, that meaningless back and forth fighting, like WWF fake matches between Dems and Reps, all for show, nothing more than a ratings driven production between the left and the right
Trump isn't about either, Trump is about fixing the nation so that both the left and the right will still have a nation to exist in, and is why Trumps appeal is far broader than any talk radio hosts is.
Trump is about the future, Hannity the hack still bringing up old P-Obama clips, that's how stupid these radio hosts think their audiences are, and almost need them to be.
Trump I get, his message I embrace, but these talk radio hosts continue to annoy the H out of me and ride this new Trump optimism like parasites feeding off of the peoples hopes.
If Hannity and Rush and the rest were really so honest, than why haven't they pointed out what Trump has over the last 6 months, long before Trump ever ran?
As noted on here, read past posts, I've always known that behind the scenes donors controlled both parties, If the zone new that, I'm certain these carney hall radio hosts did to, but they did not share that with their audience, I did, but don't have millions of listeners, they have millions of listeners yet choose to play dumb and use same ole tired 'Oh, it's all the democrats fault folks, 'The Left' is who you should be mad at folks, duh'
When now people are seeing its global financiers who control both party elected (at least on national level).
Talk radio hosts will always be frauds to me since none of them did what Trump has done in 6 months, when they all had up to 20 years to point all this out, but chose instead to create false enemies to their audiences just for ratings.
The only honest talk radio hosts, who's know longer on the air, was Art Bell.
The legendary Art Bell, he'd have guests on his over night show, talking about this stuff a decade ago, but cause his show was considered 'paranormal', what was said on his show, revealed by his guests, pretty much got ignored by rest of press.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 15, 2016 16:04:22 GMT -5
Talk radio hosts make the mistake, either on purpose, or out of being insulated from real common people, but they make the mistake of thinking the whole populace is either hardwired Democrat or Republican. Like Democrat and Republican are chromosones hardwired to people DNA. Again, that kind of framing of the populace is good for ratings driven talk radio, and for Politicians, but it doesn't translate well into the real world and how common people think and reason. To assume folks are hardwired electoral Democrats or electoral Republican in all their thoughts and thinking, like robots, is to assume people are dumb. And assuming, or wanting, or needing people to be dumb is how politicians and talk radio make their living and profits, and is why everyone else can be poor and struggling, yet talk radio hosts and politicians are always rich and flying around in business jets.  People who exploit other peoples assumed stupidity are the only ones who seem to thrive. Some former wise thoughts from this post, posted way back in 2014 long before Trump ever declared candidacy, just shows how ahead of the curb the zone has always been. What a prophetic post, the zone always feels the pulse of the people, the pulse of reality, unlike 'Cal Thomas' the commentary geek, establishment Howell the 3rd type. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 23, 2016 19:29:46 GMT -5
Common sense also means being honest
And I honestly cannot blame President Obama for Belgium's leaders stupidity for flooding their nation with so many Muslim immigrants over the years.
Our President didn't tell them to do that, nor does P-Obama run their nation, they run their own nation, which has been around before the founding of America.
The attack occurred in Belgium, Brussels, not America, and it occurred or was perpetrated by Belgium citizens at that!
They were Muslim, but none the less they were citizens...now what the hell is President Obama suppose to do about that??
Belgium needs to wise up, they have to clean up their own house, like so many other nations do.
But no, I'm to honest to even try to blame President Obama for what occurred inside of another sovereign nation by their own citizens.
I'm just not that dishonest, nor will I ever allow partisan politics to make me dishonest.
I have nothing to gain by being dishonest.
Just like when Trump or Cruz or even if Hillary gets elected, I can't and won't sit here blaming them for terrorist attacks that occur in Africa or Asia, others will, but I won't.
And the sad thing is those who now blame P-Obama for everything, will be the same ones trying to defend Trump or Cruz from same ridicule.
This all goes in cycles...an honest broker backs up and observes the cycle from afar, a dishonest person simply gets recycled over and over again and doesn't care cause truth, honesty and fairness is not what most are after.
|
|
