Common sense Conservatism, and Libertarianism.

Funny how today, Aug 5th, in 2016, a few Republican politicians joining Hillary in opposition to Trump, or 'the people' who chose Trump.

Funny how the zone was on to this years before Trump ran for office, how the zone kept trying to tell people they're all the same behind the scenes.

Yet stupid talk radio hosts kept tooting horn 'All Rep gooooood, all Dems baaaad'...talk radio hosts made millions tooting that deceptive horn, and if Trump had not run, Jeb or Rubio or Cruz would probably be the nominee.

And radio hosts would once again be selling their listeners establishment bank owned politicians.

The reason why certain Rep or joining Hillary in opposition to Trump is like Trump said earlier, and the zone before that, They're all owned or paid by the same donors behind the scenes, they all have the same bosses.

Someone tell Rush Limbaugh that, but the sad thing is he already knows it, but hides that truth from listeners so he can continue living high on the hog, maybe buy more beach front property, up grade his Jet.

If I had platform Rush had, people would see how much of a dishonest fraud they are.

To me, politics doesn't mean one has to surrender all common sense and rational

I support Trump, but am not a Republican, why?

1. Trump is issue by issue orientated, he's geared towards fixing problems, not preaching ideology that does nothing but enrich Authors and radio hosts ect.

Donald Trump is a solution based or orientated individual, like most of us are out here, he doesn't let blind ideology corrupt his ability to see an issue clearly, fix it, and then move on.

That's what most of us do at work, at our jobs, or if in military.

Career politicians are just the opposite, they don't really get paid to fix anything, rather their campaigns are funded to 'approve' Legistlation that will benefit those organizations who funded their campaigns.

I'm for Trump, what I'm not is

1. Anti black

2. Not a hateful bigot who relishes anytime citizen shot dead by police.

3. I'm pro Law enforcement, Justice, what I'm not is one who hides disdain towards others behind the color of law.

I cheer good Police shootings, but at same time condemn bad ones.

Humans are flawed, 'born with slanted natures' (unless don't believe in scripture), as such I realize just because one puts on badge, doesn't mean they suddenly become a angel.

They simply become a flawed human with a badge, and hopefully vetted enough so that can lay aside biases towards others to act 'just' when in uniform.

I'm not a 'all whites bad, all blacks good' type.

Or All blacks bad, all whites good' type...I'm a case by case type, situation by situation.

I can't approve of evil, even if evil happens to wear my same uniform, or be on same team.

And that's why ideology tends to blind people to justice and being fair.

If Dracula were a Republican, most Republicans would justify his actions, and if Dracula were a Democrat, most Democrats would justify his actions, simply cause on same team.

I don't roll like that...to me Dracula is Dracula, regardless of what team they're own, or what uniform they wear.

Also if an Angel from Heaven were a Democrat (on paper) all Rep's, Cons, would automatically condemn them, and if an Angel from Heaven were, on paper, a Rep, all Dems would condemn them, regardless of words or actions.


Sometimes humans act more like rats in an experiment than the intelligent creatures religion claims man to be...



Sometimes I wonder.

Media that asks 'who won debate' are hyper dense, and expect audience to be as well

Who won debate?...that makes no sense to the thinking, those who actually care about issues, policies.

Unless either candidate was able to persuade the other to change their views during or after debate, it's not a matter of 'who won'.

It was a stalemate.

Neither candidate changed their view during debate, so those who support either candidate for their views, (that most closely reflects their own) don't see it as matter of win or lose, but rather 'Did my candidate change any of their previous views as result of debate?'

And as of now that answer is no, for either candidate.

No one lost or won debate, and it shouldn't be framed that way.

Voters need to study issues on their own, and not decide who to vote for based on who was more entertaining at debate.

The media has really dumbed down this whole election process, both media, left and right, they all eat dinner together when off air and count their money.

Read the above, was written way back in July of 2015, of my disgust with how talk radio had been dumbing down conservatism, turning the movement into almost a cartoonish, tabloid version of former self do to being hi-jacked by ratings driven, entertainment media radio hosts, who for what ever reason I can't figure out, some consider or considered the 'face' of Conservatism.

Where as I've always seen right through their phony act, the Zone was saying what Trump is now saying, long before Trump even entered the political scene, just go back and read the dates of the posts.

As such, I can't now get excited when the likes of Hannity or Rush (and certain others) now pretend to be on the Trump train, BS.

They're simply on the train that keeps their careers alive, studio productions alive, by pandering to whatever side seems to be winning at the time.

Go ahead and read older posts on here, they don't fool me.

For years they pushed the stupid mind numbing 'All Republicans goooood, all Democrats baaaad' BS, and constantly dumbed down listeners with the whole 'The Left this, the left that', 'Leftist this, leftist that' and so forth.

And by doing so for decades provided cover for those in Republican party who were just as destructive as so called Dem politicians were supposedly.

Instead of focusing on real voting records of politicians, the wasted 10's of 1000's of hours focusing on the most dumbed down, elementary school level, cartoonish 'Obama baaaad, all Rep gooood' type of mind numbing stuff that smelt of dishonest rot from day one.

Any one with common sense knows that nothing is all good or all bad, and when people pitch to you that 'All Reps gooooooood', to the thinking at least, it smells foul.

Point is, talk radio hosts wasted decades of air time amusing listeners with cartoonish skits, soundbites and repetitive memo rhetoric, when they should of been educating people to the realities of how things really work.

But since they didn't, they're now responsible for what is occurring to Donald Trump, cause talk radio hosts helped create and shield the elite political class on the 'right' that is now turning on Trump.

And I'll never forget that and always remind people of that.

The above written in June 16th, 2014...the Zone was way ahead of it's time, yet no credit.

Everything said back then, coming true now.

While Hannity the Hack, Limbaugh the hack shoving Krony Conservatism down your throats, the Zone was telling you the truth long before Trump on scene...

Like a Wrestler, in less than 20 seconds could pin any krony talk radio hosts to the mat for not telling the truth long ago, like the zone has been doing...

How will I feel if Trump loses election?

If Trump loses election, how will I feel?

1. Like a door closed, a door of opportunity will have been closed forever, and the middle class will become a thing of the past.
Cause never ever again will a renegade billionaire ever bother running for office and putting it all on the line like Trump has, including taking a hit to his 'brand' amongst the 'snob' class, if he loses he will suffer big time, cause the 'snob' class will retaliate, and so will Hillary, probably, by regulating his empire into debt or something, who knows..

2. If Trump loses election, I feel 3rd world immigrants from Cuba, Honduras, Mexico, Haiti and more, will delight in his loss, and will continue their reign of terror on the streets, the drugs will continue to flow freely, and even working way into 'white' neighborhoods.
Under Hillary, criminals, both domestic and illegals, will feel very emboldened to continue to mock, laugh at and rape the American people in that most upright Americans taught to obey the law, be respectful, where as they're not.
They come from nations where there really is no moral law, simply the most brutal are who survive.



And they're ways of Cartel funded brutality will spread to the streets of American criminals, you'll see more cop slayings, assasinations, ect, as Hillary's administration won't do a thing to stop it, but rather still pitch criminals as being 'poor poor abused minorities' (regardless of color or nationality)

As a result, violence will increase as more people, good people, will lose faith in justice system, and instead take law into their own hand.

3. If Hillary wins, I feel more and more communities will 'break off' and away from main stream.

Mainly smaller rural areas where 'white' populations still somewhat dominate and are shielded by vast space, forests and rural lands.

Conservatives living in urban areas, especially if 'black' or non white, will have a very hard time dealing if Hillary wins.

As such some 'Black' or non white 'conservative' types may end up forming, creating, own groups, for protection.

4. If Hillary wins, I feel true 'racist' will have a hey day, recruitment into their groups will go way way up, as many normally rational whites will panic, and feel armed racist white militia groups are their last and only hope, and true racist will exploit their fears, garunteed.



Many, normally rational, or on the fence 'whites' will succumb to the rhetoric of 'white nationalists', as Hillary will enact policies that will actually and for real threaten the very survival of the 'white race' in America (And I hate to say that, but under Hillary, not sure if I can blame them for reacting this way)

5. I feel that 'scared' inner city black women who voted for Hillary will be happy and not care about anything but their hair style, and as long as fed (Gov food stamps, welfare program), and housed, they'll be happy.

6. If Hillary wins election, not sure of future of Republic, some may of just had enough, (I'm talking just regular American loving types here of all colors, not racist) and will create own political parties to carry own Trumps vision.

7. Under Hillary, I even feel that nation could break in half, or in parts, kind of like Canada, into provinces.
And I wouldn't doubt armed groups already discussing this.

And I could go on and on but will wrap this post up.

To me, Hillary is 'Death to America' from within, as she's owned by global interests.

More industry will leave, more bad trade deals passed into law, China will be allowed to buy more farmland here (Oh, you didn't know that?...for another thread)

Under Hillary, 'pay for play', American will simply be put on auction block, and those who are wealthy will benefit, others will suffer.

But mind you this, suffering people, with a will to survive, can only take so much, and is why Government so fears the 2nd Amendment class.

We shall see...

Next maybe I'll write about if Trump wins.