|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 4, 2020 13:06:10 GMT -5
I need to make a rap song, and release it wherever, maybe that would get peoples attention and expose the Conservative frauds known as talk radio hosts! Most of whom are 'double agents', and hold back on their audiences, string their audiences along for weeks, thinking those in their audiences to dumb or lazy to learn, study, research on their own once shows over. Most talk radio host have high school equivalent education and understanding about life, and others. And most are simply 'foot soldiers' for those in power cleaning your fiscal clock, and their job is to keep you off of the true trail of corruption. How can I say it any plainer than that. No wonder Rush has Bo Snirgly guard his incoming calls so carefully, cause one slip up by Bo Snirgly, and Rush is done. I always found it highly sumicious when a few years ago, maybe 10, when nothing but Conservative hosts dominated the radio land scape, 100's of them scattered on stations everywhere, and the nationalized ones, or syndicated ones, all the big names, but I always noticed no matter how much noise came out of their mouths, nothing ever changed, nothing. Obama got elected, things got worse.(if on the right), nothing changed....why? Republicans took over both houses, nothing changed, nothing, why? Conservative radio hosts montra is always to blame the 'Left'....hmm, what a tactic, what a clever tactic. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 4, 2020 13:52:54 GMT -5
My war is not with the 'left' for the 'left' only does, gets away with, what the political right allows them to, and why are they being allowed to destroy nation, and who's benefiting from this?
Keep reading....soon, maybe your eyes will be awakened as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 4, 2020 16:44:47 GMT -5
The Frauds of talk radio exposed
Podcast episode below  mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/8957rx/8th_aug_intro_to_exosing_fake_conservatives8tpm2.mp3 There are other voices out there folks, others, hungry to tell the truth about what's going on, here on Podcast, one such voice. I mean this idea that of all the movements out here in this vast line, this idea that talk radio only gives exposer to such a minute few, it's the same guests over and over and over again, what are they afraid of? It's Newt Gingrige, over and over again, and like 4 others, as if only their opinions matter? Radio contracts or something? A certain few, for business purposes, have monopolized the Conservative movement, which use to be as diverse and fresh forward moving as Progressives on the streets are today, what happened? Business interests, that's what happened...lay aside your passion, stay at home and watch Hannity instead, or listen to lying Rush...that's what happened folks. You don't think these men new about big pharma not wanting Hydroxychloroquine being marketed? You don't think Rush didn't know that his friends up there on the hill have investments in these big pharma companies, it's all so obvious why GOP doesn't do a think, they're all in on it that's why. They got stock in these big pharma companies, it's why as posted above so many of these companies being given contracts to invent vaccine... D.C. should be over thrown, the people up there, all of them are raiding our treasury, and instead of talk radio hosts telling you that, they play dumb, cause they to are in on it, they're all buddies. Once you get beyond certain fiscal wealth level, there is no left or right, just unity for them on how to make more money for themselves, while tossing crumbs to the tax payers. What a sham.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 6, 2020 11:59:07 GMT -5
Biden???
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 10, 2020 9:52:47 GMT -5
Some times I think, know, it would be a lot easier to appeal to 'Progressives' Sometimes I think, know, it would be a lot easier to appeal to progressives, cause they just seem to have way more energy, are younger, and more exciting to be around, goofy they can be at times. Conservatives, on the other hand, seem to be led by older wooden males, who preach morality on TV and the radio, yet behind the scenes date women half their age, as what recently occurred at that Christian bible college where the head guy had to step down cause picture surfaced of him standing next to younger female with his pants unzipped. www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/jerry-falwell-jr-steps-down-as-liberty-university-president-days-after-his-social-media-post/ar-BB17MT8o Jerry Falwell Jr steps down from Liberty University after picture of him standing next to younger lady with his pants unzipped, wow. Not that he represents all of conservatism, but this is what certain people 'get'. Liberals admit and embrace their flaws, conservatives try to hide them. Not that being attracted to 'youth' is a flaw, I mean who isn't attracted to younger and soxier people. Who doesn't them self want to stay as young looking for as long as possible? Cosmetics, plastic surgery, add it all up and it's over a billion dollar industry a year, or more. Back to what I was saying though, it would be much easier and probably more fun to just start appealing to Progressives, where seems all the passion is at. Where you can embrace all of yourself and not be told you're going to hell for it. I just get sick of these older wooden mainly 'W' men always pretending to be holier than everyone else, then behind the scenes finds out they're at the strip clubs in cognito. Until these older wooden dinosaur men step aside, they're going to continue to drive conservatism into the grave....it would already be there if not for Trump who yes is older, but has the spirit of a 35 year old.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 16, 2020 6:21:24 GMT -5
Kamala Harris, the chosen VP of Joe Biden, is a odd one, if you read her bio, her past, her legal past, she fought more like a Conservative...read on Kamala Harris is a odd one indeed, after reading some of her bio, and her past accomplishments as District Attorney and all, she actually seems more like 'Clint Eastwood', and that's no joke. I mean a lot of her 'tough on crime' policies are policies even conservatives would agree with, and her common sense approach to other issues, do or did make sense at the time. But as soon as she began running for President in 2015 or so, all that seemed to change, not her past, but how she presented herself. I think had she ran as the politician she was in California, her record on crime could of, would have, rivaled that of Trumps, but again, something changed after she ran for President. It's as if she put on a Democrat mask in order to become more popular with younger voters, and the more liberal elements of the DNC. She stopped talking about her 'tough on crime' past, and instead focused on Trumps alleged racist ways, it's as if she was handed a 'play book', and told to drop her past, and reinvent herself in the image of a civil rights activist 'black woman'. And again, I kind of find that disappointing, cause she does have a stellar past, I mean her past record indicates that she was more conservative than even most of todays hush puppy wearing Republicans are. Go to wikipedia and check it out for yourself... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris And if you read her past with an open and honest mind, you'll come to the same conclusion, the lady was tough on crime and other common sense Measures, with a few caviots, but who doesn't have that. Reading about her past, kind of forces me to change how I will cover Kamala Harris going forward....well yes and no, in that sadly the old Kamala is gone, buried, by the Democrat machine. I doubt that Harris will ever emerge again as long as in public life. I'm just saying though, after reading her past, it annoys me how people like her feel they have to 'change' in order to 'rise', but I guess everyone in public life does that. My question is though, if she's elected into National office, which Kamala Harris will emerge, the new one or the old tough on crime common sense one?...that is the question. One thing for sure, any Conservative talk show host who says she doesn't have any 'real life experience', don't know what they're talking about, I mean neither do they, or most Republican either, so that would be a mute point anyways. This woman, Kamala Harris, if you read her past accomplishments, she's done a lot, initiated a lot, and changed a lot, while in various offices, she's probably done more to fight crime in her district than Ted Cruz, or any other fake conservative has. But like above post says, why did she suddenly change?...I guess that's what politics does to people, makes them change just to get elected. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 16, 2020 18:45:49 GMT -5
Parler?
I'm considering joining Parler, Twitters rival, where free speech and opinion still allowed.
It's the way the social media use to be, but you do open self up to seeing a lot of 'ugly' opinions, and not all of it motivated by patriotism, a lot of stuff said simply out of raw unadultrated hate.
And you can't really reason with blind hate.
But I originally came from that raw open internet environment, when people just said whatever with the only intent to hurt others...that's not conservatism.
But ye, I won't know what it's like until I try it I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 16, 2020 23:22:16 GMT -5
More on Parler
I've been reading up a lot about Parlor, even their user agreement, which always makes you dizzy and a bit upset, regardless of the site.
In the end, its obvious most of these sites gain by gathering and collecting and then sharing and distributing our personal information.
But a few things about Parler that stood out to me is that they have their own video platform, so I guess you can upload content to their video feed, and by-pass You Tubes.
And they have their own 'parler coin', like bit coin type of currency I guess?
I don't know, I'm thinking about joining them, and they to have a verification method if you chose to use your real name, but unless a public figure, not sure why anyone would want to use their real actual name, for own privacy reasons.
I mean you'd have to be a very disciplined soul to use your own real name, and you'd have to stay out of heated conversations and never write anything dumb...especially if employed and your employer got wind of it.
But ye, if I can convince self to get past all the user agreement stuff (which can't be avoided now days no matter which site you join), then maybe I to will join Parler and help even promote it, cause I'd love to see twitter go bankrupt from all the people they've shadow banned, who just wanted to express genuine thought.
Even I get shadow banned on twitter.
You can post Liberal stuff for 100 posts, then on one post support Trump, and that's all it takes, some behind the scene dork will ban you as if you're hard core right wing or something.
Twitter has kicked itself in the but and I hope they crumble.
I just kind of wish there was a twitter/parler alternative that was catered more towards general topic, and not just extreme right or extreme left politics.
Added note:
They also want your phone number for communications, maybe texts and updates, but here's the thing, I use my cell phone for work and as a alarm clock when sleeping, and the last thing I need is to keep getting woken up by annoying texts from anyone. I work nights, and sleep during the day, I need total silence when sleeping.
I recently changed my phone number and since doing so have only received 1, just one 'spam' call, that's near unheard of these days, but I'm sure once I share new number with Parler or any other place like that, I'm sure that would change...so I have a bit more thinking to do about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 17, 2020 0:08:14 GMT -5
AUN conservative news network? aun-tv.com/ AUN stands for 'America's Uncensored News network', or something like that. I just visited their site, but did not see any TV programing, but I think it's ran by 'Conservative Commando' and their team. And I think they're currently looking to hire Conservative news broadcasters. Again, just trying to help give exposure to other conservative voices other than celebrity types on Fox and talk radio, who don't reflect the more wide view of the heartland all of the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 17, 2020 16:47:45 GMT -5
Whether Parler or twitter, or other social media, in the end it's all for not.
In the end you simply end up wasting dozens or hundreds of hours just typing to self, thinking you're making a difference, when most really aren't.
All we're doing is allowing others to profit off of our personal exchanges, that's it.
We provide the content, they monetize our content...it's that simple, and we, the content providers get nothing out of it.
A better way to make a difference, or at least to earn money, is to write a book, or create own publication and sell it, at least then earning money off of your own thoughts and opinion, instead of allowing other to.
But even that's hard to do now since internet traffic is so own and controlled by a few giant traffic cartels like google...is why I left google, google doesn't care about the 'small' person anymore, and will get buried on their search engine, totally ignored.
Is why I use a different browser now and so forth.
It doesn't matter how fabulous you are, or what you write or share, if search engines aren't displaying your works.
In the past, before google and others took over internet traffic, back when traffic was truly random and wide open, everyone and anyone could get 1000's of views per day, = exposer, but then the google pimps moved in, and others like google, and decided to control the traffic, monetize the traffic, like the cartel does with drugs, the cartel monetizes certain drug routes and if want to push your drugs, have to pay the cartel to do so, well that's what google and others have done with internet traffic.
If you want to play, now you have to pay.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 17, 2020 22:36:21 GMT -5
I get sick of politician on either side telling us we're 'divided', I hate that, I'm not 'divided' against anyone I get sick of politician on either side, or radio hosts, or any dorky person who would utter that statement saying 'Err, we're so divided as a nation'...says who?  Just because a few activist on TV like to yell and shout into the camera, does not ever mean the majority of people in this nation are divided!! That's such a sham term! They said the same under Obama, under G-Bush, and so forth. I don't feel divided against no one or nothing, a may disagree on certain issues, but I don't feel 'divided'. Nor do I see division in daily life, when I go to work I see people of all colors and stripes laughing, joking, sharing stories together, no politics ever come up. When I go shopping, I don't see any riots or division, I don't see people fighting in the isles, what I see is peace and calm. So this sham idea that 'we're divided' is false. Or maybe it's just me in that politics and polititions just don't have that kind of sway over me. I like and decide who to love and get along with regardless of who's in office, as do most people. Trump, Obama, Bush, ect, none of them have the power to effect whom I decide to like and get along with. That power alone goes to 'God' and common sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 17, 2020 23:06:34 GMT -5
It also annoys me how many so called radio conservatives only acknowledge racial injustice of the past, only when doing so strengthens a particular current argument 'they' are trying to make.
Like how 'Dana', a female talk radio hosts, points out that 'gun laws' were originally drawn up as a measure to keep former slaves from owning guns, or even dogs.
Well if conservatives as smart and transparent as advertised by selves, then this should of been pointed out decades ago, not just 'today' in defense of 'gun rights' battle in California.
You gotta understand, when you knowledge is deep in history, as mine is, than you're able to see how much radio hosts hold back on, either out of ignorance, or deceit, and is why I struggle giving any of them a pass, cause the more you actually know about history, and if honest, you have to be honest, than the smaller and smaller most talk radio hosts will seem to you, cause you'll begin to witness how, like the left, they just love to leave stuff out, just to make 'self' seem right.
To me, just throw out all information, and let listeners decide how to digest it, that's my approach.
I don't put out info to favor Libs or Cons, or blacks or whites or anyone in between, I just put out info, and let people decide own their own how to digest it.
At least that's what I'd do if had large radio show/platform.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 18, 2020 22:06:35 GMT -5
I just can't take listening to Conservative talk radio, if all they do now is re-air all the negative things Democrat politicians say
I mean what's the point of conservative talk when all they do is always trail after 'Progressives' and Democrat politicians.
All they do is re-air the stuff and comments made on MSNBC, CNN, New York Times and so forth.
All they do is re-air all the stuff you deliberately avoided.
Then they, talk radio hosts, reward you by re-airing all the negative stuff Democrat Politicians said, why do they do that, to annoy you, me, the audience?, I mean what's the point?
If I and others wanted to hear what Michelle Obama said, we'd of tuned into the speech ourselves, so why re-air it on Conservative radio?
All these conservative hosts do is give Progressives a wider platform, yet Progressives never ever do the same for conservative voices, I mean heck, if conservative can't even post on Twitter or FB or YT unless do so undercover, yet these brick headed Conservative hosts like Levin, Rush and Hannity, spend majority of their shows re-airing all the stuff no one would of ever heard, if not for these shows airing it.
I mean why not re-air what conservatives say, why not air what up and coming conservative or libertarians have to say, why not help boost the presence of unknowns on the conservative side instead of always re-airing every and anything those on the left spout off.
I mean who's side are these conservative hosts on anyways?
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 20, 2020 4:44:59 GMT -5
P-Obama gave great speeches, and President Trump delivers great speeches
Both Presidents have the ability to give great speeches, and anyone who disagrees is a liar, and willing to allow politics to turn them into a 'half truth teller'...which equals, well, more politics.
Truth is, you, we, I, may not agree with the content of either mans speech, but to just sit there and blanketly praise whomever's speech simply cause they're on your team is disingenous, or to blanket condemn another's speech cause they're not on your team, also is fake.
Obama is a elegant soothing speaker, now I happen to think his politics are jaded, but that doesn't take away from fact the man can speak.
Trump delivers some very firery speeches, at first I couldn't stop listening to them in beggining when he was new to politics, but he speech is more clumsy than that of Obama.
They both have their styles, like different instruments.
I just wish both sides would stop with the mild like opinionated means spirited back and forths.
On either side, the only one really working for, sacrificing for the people is Trump, everyone else in it for self, Kamala Harris had it wrong on that point for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 20, 2020 4:53:14 GMT -5
And for crying out loud there is no 'racial division' or 'racial riots' going on or occurring, where does the low IQ media come up with this stuff?
Nor can Biden bring people together or less any more or less than Obama or Trump could.
It's like the mirror effect or something.
Conservatives said 'Oh that Obama, what a divider'...duh
Progressives say 'Oh that Trump, what a divider'...duh
Are humans this dense and incapable of standing back and seeing what's going on?
|
|
