PBS, outstanding non partison news and documentary source.

Also you can often tell the color of a Doctors soul depending on what kind of words they use.

If a Doctor uses words like 'fatal', 'dismal', low probability', stay away from them, go some where else.

Also when others try to describe back to you what they think your reaction was to something and use sentences as follow, stay away from them.

Examples:

'Oh I bet when you found you had ______ you must of been scared and horrified'

'Right now I know you're feeling confused and lost'

'You must have been devastated by the news'

Basically when others in medical field try to suggest to you, how you're reaction was to something, and always suggest you reacted in the most fearful manner...run away from such types.

Cause they are sadists, who derive a sick pleasure out of watching others torment from issues beyond their control.

Run from such m/f's...

PBS



I know people may laugh, but where I get my best information now is from PBS...why?

Cause they interview the 'opposition', they interview, and allow to speak on show all view points.

Why?

Cause their reporters actually still do deep reporting, rather than just opinionated stuff, like Fox, CNN ect.

I don't need anyone telling me how to think, what to think, and although PBS may be 'left' (according to partisan types), at least to me their commentators don't try to tell me how to think.

All I need is information...I can do the rest on my own.

And contrary to right wing popular belief, PBS is not some propaganda machine...they actually go places, other nations, interview people, create reports, that allow you the listener or viewer the chance to think.

To think without having some partisan hack type screaming at you and telling you 'how to think' or fall on any given issue.

I don't care if you don't believe me...all I know is PBS, their old fashion style of reporting, is actually refreshing in todays partisan bias news room environment.

On PBS I can still learn about Bears, without having Bill O'Reilly scream at me and tell me how rotten I am for still caring about nature...

PBS, and all their affiliates, is some of the last places you can actually get in depth, non partisan news coverage or biographies, or other informational stuff unrelated to the whole partisan politics circus



I know many on the political right have been brainwashed or conditioned to 'hate' or 'despise' PBS and it's affiliates, but I have not, cause I'm fiercely independent and rational.

First, yes of course, some at PBS, some of their correspondents, when doing interviews, or broadcasts, or round tables, do have political biases, but please remember that's a very small part of the whole PBS Universe.

When I tune into PBS, it's to escape the wild circular pop culture 'right vs left' commercialized fiasco.

When I tune into PBS, it's usually while their airing a story about other cultures, or biographies of famous historical people, or doing story about animals, nature and more.

I mainly tune into PBS for it's non political broadcast or radio.

And I can honestly say they're one of the last few remaining broadcast agencies that still actually have real live reporters that go out into the field, do actual live research, conduct actual live interviews with people.

And I so appreciate that.

I don't need angry 'right wing' or 'left wing' commentators on Fox, or MSNBC constantly telling me what to think about others.



All I need is 'information'.

And people who tune into PBS enjoy information, we can do the rest with that information on our own.

PBS gets a bad rap on the right that I feel is unfair.

PBS and it's affiliates, automatically seen as 'the enemy' by many on the right, which to me is a blind and unfair indictment.

I'm no one's propaganda slave, I like seeing for myself what another is about, or this or that group, I do my own investigating to shift through the propaganda on my own, and so wish more on both the right and left would do the same, instead of constantly being lead around emotionally by talking heads.

If PBS goes away, nothing really left to listen to in the media other than bought, sold and paid for political propaganda

I'm a Trump voter and supporter, but still independent enough to see the value in Public Broadcast System.

They still have class, like the days of old, their reporters are still dispatched to far corners of the nation and planet, to bring us interesting news and events, that other commercial news rooms stopped doing 10 years ago.

When's the last time CNN or Fox actually sent reporters out to cover real news event? (other than riots)

They don't, all they do is create panels full of opinions...sorry, but that's not news, that's 'Entertainment Tonight'.

I'm not a wild 'Leftist' or political liberal (artistically can be, but not ethically).

And I'll continue to fight for the right of PBS to exist, cause we need that fresh air, that vent, those stories, biographies, science journals that give us an escape from tabloid politics.

To be continued.

Public radio host 'Josh' who hosts show 'A1A', their show is good, solid enough, to compete with other shows on 'commercial radio!

For whatever reason 'E' search engine won't lead me to 'Josh' or 'A1A' public radio show, instead leads me to other crap, imposters, or groups with same name.

All that aside, if listen to NPR, you'll know who 'Josh' (the host is) and you'll know the show 'A1A', despite search engine pretending to not know what I'm searching for.

I don't get paid for this, I don't get paid to promote, I don't get paid for nothing, as such you get what you get.

All that aside, the reason why I so very much enjoy the NPR program 'A1A', and Josh, their host is for the following reasons.

1. I don't know Josh's politics...I don't know if they're left or right or independents, as such they remain an objective host to me, as such tells me, as a listener, they want me to 'learn', rather than be indocternated (misspelled), the way commercial radio hosts need you to be.

Josh, the host of A1A is curious, yes, but doesn't politicize his curiosity, and that's what keeps his show so doggon 'fresh' (again, not a word)

Josh replaced 'Dian R', she was a Dolly Parton type of blonde, but older, and retired like last year.

Josh, has surprised many and totally revamped that show, given it some 2017 modern muscle and restoration.

In closing, and will later create 'thread' just for A1A, just want to say I listen to all radio, Rush, Hannity, Savage, Levin, and the rest, and can say of all of them that 'Josh' is the most talented and fair.

And actually do believe 'Josh' could take show, with current format, to 'AM or FM' commercial radio, and compete with Rush and Hannity and other ideologs (not a word, so what who cares, if smart you'll know what I mean, not what I spell...lol)

This is an issue I'll be pushing in up coming days, weeks, months, is that Josh on A1A, I do believe is one of the rare, few, hosts on NPR, that is of such talent, that show could cross over and compete with commercial shows like Rush.

Why?

1. People want an alternative to 'All Rep goooood, every single democrat under the sun baaaad'...which seems to be all commercial talk radio host pitch.

2. People enjoy hearing all points of view, even though talk radio hosts like Rush, Savage, able to talk only to self for hours, without ever having guest on, to dispute their viewpoint.
Most people are still very rational, and want to be fair, and want to hear all sides of an issue.

3. Unlike Sean Hannity, Josh, from A1A is actually 'fair' to guests, doesn't allow WWF or WCW type of verbal sparring to occur...



The above is commercial talk radio, intellectual chaos, yet appeals to Dorito eating bear drinking types.

Josh's show 'slows' down the issues, slows down the news, and creates seat in audience for the 'thinking' types.

Anyways, out of time, got other things to do, but this will be continued later...

Not only that but all these nice tolerant people I use to see on PBS, or anywhere in media, I just don't see them in real life.

On PBS and other media, people seem 'different', scripted maybe?, but seems once people leave their studios, get off camera, they act, behave as if it's still 1960.

Funny or sad that on TV, everyones so 'soxually aware' now, trans this, bi lateral that, all these different ways to define yourself now...but in my real life, the places I go, you'd still think it were 1960.

Men still act like Fred Flintstone and the women still pretty much act like Betty.

I just don't see the 'color and diversity' of thought in the real world, I still pretty much see 'tradition'.

I guess you have to live in certain exclusive neighborhoods to see that stuff actually manifest itself, but in every common street America, if you're a male, or people percieve you are, and walk down the street wearing a purple dress with green hair, you'll get laughed at or worse.

I think TV/media makes society seem like it's way more socially advanced, progressed, than it really is.

It's not Star Trek era yet, where people willing to sit down with alien, with 2 noses and 3 mouths and have a drink, we're just not there yet.