|
Post by X factor on Dec 25, 2013 15:48:23 GMT -5
Why can't people, regardless of which side they argue, distinguish the age of the earth, the rocks, matter, elements, from the age of 'life on earth'? Why is that so hard? Like the moon dust...the moon has been lifeless since man began noticing...but tomorrow, if man, through technology, gave it an atmosphere, and then life...you would not equate age of actual moon, with age of 'life on the moon'... Or like a vacant house...a house can sit vacant for years...then family moves in... But an intelligent person would not equate age of house, to date, family moved in...obviously the house sat vacant years before family moved in... And it's the same way with this planet...Earth, the rock, could of been here for millions of years...but life on earth, could be much more recent... Both sides, people who argue both sides of creation, evolution issue, are sometimes dishonest...but when dishonest you stop learning new things... To be continued...
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 2, 2014 15:37:05 GMT -5
Life, living organisms, require 'information' in order to exist 'as is', dead or none living matter, such as 'gold' or minerals, or sand, do not, and is why they sit there lifeless, only changing or morphing when extreme environment around them dictates, like extreme heat or cold, or erosion do to weather. Life requires information. And information requires intelligence.
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jan 13, 2019 21:10:04 GMT -5
If all I am is some engineered baboon than what does life, or anything else really matter?
|
|