Different layers of same sox attraction broken down.

I also notice that when it comes to TV, and Movies, most male gay couples are always in there 40's, and look like plumbers.

Not sure why Hollywood and TV steer clear of portraying gay male couples as being younger and 'cute' or 'fem'...instead on TV and in Hollywood most gay male couples are portrayed as looking like plumbers, or construction men.

'Dallas buyers club'..

A very sad yet touching movie that will make you cry, but only if you have a heart...

Women who wear to much make up remind some of drag queens



Women who wear a ton of make-up remind some of drag queens, as if have same attention grabbing DNA as drag queens.

And is why many 'true' gay males are turned off by drag queens because drag queens remind a gay male of a woman and gay males aren't attracted to things associated with 'feminine' traits.

Although not sure when make-up became a feminine thing, as in nature it's usually only the male species that are adorned in bright colors.

On a pure form, as if studying from an Alien point of view, make-up is neither a fem or masculine application, it's simply a way one of either species artificially enhances features for the purpose of standing out.

It is assumed people want to stand out for the purpose of finding a mate, which then produces marriage, hobbits ect.

But in 2016, the modern world, the intent of attracting another isn't soley done for pairing anymore.

How do you classify a male who's attracted to another male who dresses up like what he thinks is a female?

Confused some would say.

Maybe that will be explored in future post when more time allotted.

Breaking news, Andrew

Andrew Gillum, former Mayor of Tallahassee (can't believe I spelled that correctly) and former candidate for Governor, has come out and announced they're 'bi-soxual'.

Read more about it here....www.out.com/politics/2020/9/14/florida-democrat-andrew-gillum-comes-out-bisoxual

Or just google or 'bing' search it on your own.

The zone is always so far ahead of what is going on.

It's been said on here that if people not afraid to be honest with themselves, most are indeed bi-soxual to one extent or another.

And being bi-soxual doesn't mean you want to 'bed' everyone you happen to be attracted to or who you think looks good..that's a false notion created by churches, that do more to destroy other peoples happiness than almost any other institution I can think of, by always making people feel ashamed, thus hide, natural feelings towards others.

The church teaches people to 'lie' about how they really feel, as not to be ostricized, thus countless millions spend their lives alone, isolated, living a lie, rather than being with whom they want.

Don't doubt me on that, Andrew Gillum is just one example of many who simply don't admit their bi-soxual.

As stated on here before, people are attracted to 'body types', styles, attitudes and behavior, and those traits may not always be wrapped up in opposite gender.

Not all 'B' males attracted to women with big wide booties who are short and have long exaggerated finger nails, that can be a turn off to many males who prefer simple and streamlined.

I mean it varies, no telling who or what Andrew Gillum is attracted to and why.

Also, often times people come out ahead of time rather than being 'outted' by another.

Maybe he was about to be 'blackmailed', and figured he'd release news himself rather than coming from dubious source....who knows.

All I know is if you read posts in the zone, you'll learn a lot, some of it may seem silly, or 'out there', but it's all true, and every day proves that more and more.

Not sure if following analyst fits in this section, but I'll share some ideas anyways

With me, I notice that I'm more inclined to be attracted to another, regardless of their gender, the more 'soft souled' they come off as being, and the more 'fem' (that might not be the right term) their outer appearance seems to me.

'Fem' might not be the right word, cause a male can look youngish, cute, and soft, but not sure if that would be considered 'fem'.

People have different definitions of fem.

Some think 'fem' means looking like a prostitute and acting real saucy and inviting, like theater or something.

Others think 'fem' means being more naturally soft, in how one carries themselves, in a male maybe that would be called 'boyish'? or humble?

Or maybe 'relaxed'?

You just know it when you see it, or when another has it in them, it's not something one can fake.
Or maybe in a male it's called 'being laid back and at ease'?

That aside, looks, and body type plays a large role also initially.

Example

The other day I found myself just as eager to help out a very thin, slender male, wearing shorts, and sandals at work, as I did to help out a female who also needed help at work.

I was drawn to both, to the female, ye she happened to be decent looking to me, but with the woman I responed to help her more out of 'duty as a male to help any female in distress'...then the fact that she looked decent came in second.

But with the guy who needed help, I knew they were a guy ahead of time, but it was their appearance, their thin skinny look, vulnerable look, that made me want to help them, had it been a heavy set guy with a beard, not so much.

I guess the more 'fem' or 'soft' another is in front of me, the more my 'manhood' is activated, regardless of their gender.

And when you think about it, that's how most males are, just most won't admit it.

Let me repeat that, that's how most men are, just most won't repeat it out of fear of being labeled 'gay'.

But when you observe, most guys, at least when younger, have very cute looking male friends.

It's almost like the more cute the guy friend you have looks, the cooler you are to be seen with them...not gay, but cute.

And sorry, but if you're one of those pre-historic thinking males, or even females, who still deny that a guy can't be cute, than what else do you lie to yourself about?

Sorry, but words have descriptive meanings, and yes, a males can look both rough and tough and or cute and even pretty...those are descriptive terms, not soxual orientation terms.

I see plenty of women that don't look cute to me, and plenty of slender college aged males who do.
That doesn't mean I want to hump them or sleep with them, it just means I'm honest with descriptive words.

Does that make me 'bi-soxual', the lame or curious may ask (ask yourself the same question).

And to me, no it doesn't, it simply makes me honest.

There's nothing I hate more, as I age, than being around insecure people whom you cannot be honest around.

Nothing worse than males who are so gdm frail on the inside that if you refer to another male as being cute, they panic and get that giggly frail voice and are like 'Hey man, or you gay or something?'...duh, says the frail as glass on the inside guy.

As if if you are gay, you're going to instantly throw them to the ground and begin humping them right there on 5th and Colfax street while traffic is driving by.

Fear makes people totally irrational, that's for sure.

And then, as I get older, I begin asking myself what soxuality is all about (now subject matter changing a bit)

Is it a sin to be attracted to someone of the same sox when pro creation with opposite sox is no longer possible or likely?

I mean the whole purpose of heterosoxuality is to pro create, but there's many relationships that are formed outside the pro creation dynamic.

In other words a guy can date a woman, say a older woman who can't have any hobbits, but they still engage in xual activity together, what's that called?

Or a guy, can do the same with another guy, and the end result is still 'no family', then it's simple 'pleasure' for pleasures sake.

I mean guys have cake with women all the time, who don't intend on starting families with, just look at the Korn industry.

Billions spent on Korn, where people get espoused, just for the sake of it...is that any different than being 'gay'?

And when 76, withered, and unattractive, will any of it have mattered?

When all those you tried impressing are dead and gone, will what you did, who you kissed, when you were 25 have mattered?

No, it will all be forgotten, as if never occurred, and those you engaged with under the sheets will be under the earth, in a grave, or ashes scattered.

People just tend to make a big deal out of stuff that won't matter 100 years from now.

Anyways, I'm all over the map here, the important thing is just to get people thinking about stuff, mainly thinking about themselves, cause that's what it all comes back to and that is 'you'.

For me, I don't like the term 'gay', cause it's a final destination name or implication

I don't think being colorfully artful as a male has a soxual destination, other people try to give it one, but that doesn't make it so.

To me it starts with body type, as least as you get older.
When younger, you're just trained to be attracted to only the female gender or opposite sox, cause of course that's how species pro-create.
But say as you get older, never had hobbits of your own, and or if did are now grown, in other words when pro-creation no longer apart of the equation, than well many people's tastes tend to broaden, based on body types.

And that varies greatly from person to person, culture to culture.

Some guys like big booty type women with all the jugs and all, other guys prefer skinny, thin, more petite women who have more of a slender males body or WNBA type of body.

And then you can break it down to hands, feet, hair, face ect, it can get complex.

For instance, I often see W guys, younger ones, as in early 20's, who at least in the media, tend to have softer looking hands and feet than do B females, not all, but many.

Whites, at least when younger, tend to have glowy, creamie skin that looks radient, at least in the media.

But that changes as they age do to sun damage.
But I like soft hands, I don't like large field type of hands on a female, and then the long nails crap scares me even more.

If I could design my own mate, they'd for sure have the soft hands of younger white males.

to be continued.