|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 6, 2014 20:01:37 GMT -5
Ghost Busters II should of never been made, it's beyond bad
Sorry, but this movie should of never been made...gross.
Full of iconic 80's techno/disco sound tracks, and very non funny lines written for comedians...this movie sequel should of never been produced.
Gross...
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 6, 2014 21:33:22 GMT -5
Jurassic Park 3 should of never been made
Jurassic Park 1 and 2 were enough...part 3 should of never been made.
Seems it was simply made so puppetiers and CGI animators could have a bit of fun experimenting with effects.
No real plot here, no characters you really feel strongly about, just 'Land of the Lost' type of encounter with giant puppet Dinosaurs...
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 18, 2014 22:53:05 GMT -5
Predator 2, this movie should of never been made This movie definitely should of never been made or created. Talk about cheesy, disco-esque... Terrible. Everything bad about the 80's is wound up in this movie. This is yet another movie, sequel that should of never been made or produced. Predator deserves, deserved, better than this.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Dec 31, 2014 18:42:22 GMT -5
 'Exorcist the Beginning' This movie definitely should of never been made and added absolutely nothing to the Exorcist series. The first movie worked so well cause it was 'spontaneous' and had never been done before. I'm watching E-the Beginning right now and have never seen such a dull movie, dull actors, dull extras. Nothing scary about this movie at all, it should of never been created. A dud on arrival. It came out in 2004. ContinuedWell I've continued watching the movie, and towards the end it does get a bit more graphic, bloody. But one thing that's not real about these demon possession movies is that while demons inside person, they bend, contort, their bodies in ways that snap bones and vertebrae, so that even if, when, demons leaves body, person would be paralyzed and unable to move or walk. Like in the 1st Exorcist when head spun around, that would have killed that girl right there on the spot, the physical body would of ceased to function, demon or no demon inside. Back to this movie, amongst other things it fail because the characters are so dull, their actions, reactions so 'flat'. In older movies the actions and reactions of characters were way more believable for some reason, maybe cause more had Broadway theater experience. Where as todays actors all seem to come from generic acting schools or cross over from other entertainment venues. A lot of us out here in real world would make so much better directors, producers, than those tasked to do so. Cause we live true horror out here, and don't just learn about it in school and books. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 3, 2015 22:00:07 GMT -5
Terminator 'Salvation'
A movie that should of never been made.
1. Filled with bland generic actors that it's hard, if not impossible to care about.
That's really the main reason, movie just has a made for TV feel to it, generic actors, generic sound track, feels more like an episode of Mc Gyver'
This movie just has a generic feel to it, actually they all do other than part 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 21, 2015 16:46:00 GMT -5
When it comes to movies that never should of been made, sequels sure do top the list, and National Lampoons European vacation, starring then funny man Chevy Chase practically tops the list of sequels that should of never been made.
Straight up the movie s_cks!
Comes off as being very stale, just a shadow of it's successful predecessor, the first Lampoons Vacation movie, which was original. (Actually idea taken from Brady Bunches Grand Canyon episode, but that's for another post).
The first Lampoons vacation felt totally spontaneous, even improvised during certain scenes, bottom line it worked.
NL vacation II does not, there's really nothing funny about it, Rusty, the little red headed hobbit from first movie, is all grown up and looks like College basketball player and awkward. (I think that was last major movie he was ever in).
The whole thing just feels forced, families just don't behave like that, not even back then. There no real chemistry in the movie between the characters, each scene feels more like a skit that tries to be funny on own merit.
Just not a very funny movie when compared to the first, and that's what sequels are always compared to.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 21, 2015 18:29:28 GMT -5
^ Continued from Above ^
On the other hand, 'National Lampoons Vegas Vacation' 1997, and the 4th movie in the series, was actually, and still is, a pretty decent movie to watch, and I'd say it's more inline with first Vacation movie.
Even though son and daughter are played by different performers, the movie works and chemistry feels right, and this is probably simply do to different director and writer from European movie.
That really explains a lot, like chefs, different chefs can take same food and give same food totally different taste.
This movie was written by Elisa Bell and directed by Stephen Kessler, where as European Vacation movie was written by John Hughes and directed by Amy Heckerling.
This totally explains why both movies have such a different feel to them.
Again directors and writers are like chefs, they can take same basic ingredients, but their own personal taste, style and vision will give final movie or meal totally different effect or taste.
Vegas Vacation should of followed the original 1983's National Lampoons Vacation, cause both movies are kind of on the same wavelength.
By the way the original Lampoons vacation movie was written by Harold Ramis and directed by John Hughes, who also directed European movie, which had different writer.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 27, 2015 21:16:02 GMT -5
Dumb and Dumber part 2 should of never been made
This has got to be Jim Carries all time worst movie he's ever been suckered to star in.
After this I think he started going serious casting roles.
This is to Jim Carrie what 'The Golden mild' was to Eddie Murphy' their worst comedic performances ever.
Not sure how this movie ever made it out of production.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 10, 2015 20:25:05 GMT -5
Tom Cruises worst movie ever
If Tom Cruise could do it again, I'm sure he'd skip this production.
This is to Tom Cruise what the movie 'Metro' was to Eddie Murphy.
I guess every actor is allowed that one movie that almost destroys their career real early on.
I'm sure this odd hobbit, sorcery, movie done in 1984 is one Tom Cruise hopes people never find, but it is found here in the zone and included in movies that probably should of never been made.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 29, 2015 0:00:49 GMT -5
Halloween 3, season of the witch, should of never been made
In my opinion this movie should of never been made, but since it was they should of not borrowed from the 'Halloween' franchise name, since Michael Meyers doesn't even appear in this installment.
The movies about some kind of occult music, music that when played harms people, makes them explode, or rot.
To this day I still don't really understand the theme.
It's actually kind of more creepy now than it was years ago, cause it's so weird.
It's like everyone who listens to the music being broadcast over the TV, they die while wearing their masks or something.
Just makes no sense.
If anything feels more like a Twilight Zone episode gone bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 2, 2015 7:00:37 GMT -5
Staying Alive, is a movie that should of never been made (1983)
(Actually I think it's the sequal to this movie I meant to post and write about, the original 'Staying Alive' is good for it's era, I think it's one of the sequals to this movie I mean to say never should of been made)
Even for it's era, just not sure why this movie 'Staying Alive' was ever created.
Back when society was making transition from Disco to like techno soul club sound, or something, it was terrible.
One of the worst eras of music and style ever (1983), at least in my opinion. I mean how many great songs in history came from the year 1983?
I think Michael Jacksons thriller album came out in 1984.
This movie sucks.
And I don't understand how this was around the end of John Travolta's run as an actor, how goes away for like a decade or more, then re emerges as one of the wealthiest actors in America, what was he doing while away from acting that netted him so much income I wonder.
Stallone had heavy influence in this movie, I think even maybe directed it, this was the film era of heavily over exaggerated corn ball Italian characters.
I think Travolta's sox appeal to many at the time, and riding off the success of 'Saturday night fever', which this movie was a sequel of, is the only thing that got him through this.
And also maybe back then a certain New York, greasy, Manhattan crowd kind of liked this kind of urban fantasy dance tract type of stuff.
But watching it now, as I type this, it's an embarrassment, and the movie should of never been made.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 7, 2015 23:04:01 GMT -5
Conan the Barbarian 2011 (remake) This movie should of never been made, created or produced
Sorry but in no way shape or form does this movie live up to the first, not one slightest bit.
Movie, background music, actors chosen, all feel cheesy and 'production' compared to original.
The original, even for older, just felt way more organic, or Norctic, more Midevial.
I think what you've been through really passes over into character actor plays, and Arnold S, being someone who really rose up, came from Austria, his character just had more 'feel', more 'depth' to it, than the guy who plays Conan in the 2011 version.
Sorry but the 2011 version of Conan just doesn't add up, it should of never been made, or if made should of used different title not connected with the original Conan movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 25, 2019 21:19:51 GMT -5
Night of the living dead 3-D
Why did they even make this movie, that one male actor was good in the Rod Zombie series, but in this series, their just a class B actor....may they rest in peace.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jan 11, 2021 2:00:25 GMT -5
The 'Langoliers'...huh?...1995
It's so goofy that I still feel like watching it, it's about pac-man balls, with mouths, that are gobbling up the world and time.
It almost feels more like a cartoon, but I think it was one of 'Stephen Kings' projects.
Luckely when wealthy, one can afford to have hit and miss movies.
Cause if this had been my only movie, Hollywood would have said 'Good-by, don't let the door hit ya'.
That aside..shh...about to watch it again.
---------------------------------------------------------
added note:
Actually this isn't such a bad movie, I've watched it from beginning to near end this time, normally I only catch like the last30% of the movie and so don't get the full context, but this time I've watched it from beginning to near end, and when I do that the movies isn't as bad as the ending makes it seem if just only view the last part of movie.
It kind of plays out like a mystery, and can see how the original story came from a book.
And I'll go a step further and say this movie is ripe for a remake, well depends, cause now days remakes aren't always so good.
Remakes now days, tend to play on an audiences stupidity, you know, loud 'surprise music', women who act and or look like prostitute, and a ton of political correct characters along with bad acting.
So maybe not.
The movie deals with the eroding of time, that's a concept that actually can be scary if you think about it...back to the movie now.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jan 18, 2021 2:07:59 GMT -5
City Heat- 1984
I don't know, sometimes maybe movies get better with time, but for years and years I always thought to myself 'Why did they make this movie?'
I think at the time Burt and Clint were like at the top of their Hollywood statures, and people for years wanted to see these two front men be in a movie together, that's fine and all, but I just never liked the theme of this movie.
I would of rather them both play outlaws facing off in a Western, or maybe Burt as a Outlaw Biker and Clint as a County Mounty, or just some other combination other than in this film.
Burt's character came off as 'goofy', and Clint was the 'straight man', as in balance.
Maybe if I watched it now it might seem better only cause Burt is no longer around, and Clint getting up there.
As proud as Burt is behind the scenes, I'm surprised he allowed himself to play the 'goofy' role in this movie.
Hey, check it out, maybe you'll have a different take on the movie.
|
|
