|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 30, 2015 19:22:58 GMT -5
Bill O'Reilly is now on my radar I just can no longer take the stupid things he says anymore on his show that go unchallenged. The suggestions he makes about others, without allowing those 'others' the opportunity to respond. And the few guest he does have on his show with more enlightened views, all he does is talk all over them, never lets them get in a full sentence, as if afraid his audience might learn what a electoral, ratings driven hack he really is. Remember this, the more TV or Radio talk show hosts talk over their guest, the more dishonest they are. They hide, bury, edit, what other people have to say, as if afraid it will expose their disingenuous ways. But on here, in the Zone...I control the mic, and will give Bill O'Reilly a taste of his own medicine... Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 15, 2015 22:33:30 GMT -5
O'Reilly loves throwing around the term 'Black' to his audience, lazy commentators science'Black this, and black people that blah blah blah!'So much for conservatives being color blind, seems all Fox News does is impress upon their audiences mind day in and day out that these separate 'Black!' citizens exist out there in one big statistical clump. (like muppets or something)  Time allowing I want to demonstrate (to those who can actually think and consider real life information) I want to demonstrate that the term 'black', in 2015, is a very generic term. There are to many individual factors into why people do what they do now days. For instance 'Black unemployment'...to me that term makes no sense. People aren't unemployed do to the color of their skin unless others aren't hiring them for that reason. I mean according to Bill O'Reilly 'blacks' can't get hired (using his logic), than why not? So either people aren't hiring them simply cause their black (then we have racism) or maybe these individuals, like all other U.S. Citizens, aren't gainfully employed for other reasons that have nothing to do with what particular shade of brown one happens to be. To just say all 'black' people are unemployed for the exact same reason borderlines retarded. Not only that but people at Fox, Bill, must not get out much and go down to warehouses, must never observe truck drivers, dock workers, union workers, restaurant workers, firement, cops, Doctors, TV anchors, teachers and so forth, they just must not get out much cause where I live there are plenty of people deemed 'black' by Bill and or Fox News, that are gainfully employed and have been for years, decades. People who want to work usually do and can. But if Bill O'Reilly is taking small sample of criminal inmates, or former, released from Jail/Prison with records, than of course within that demographic unemployment will be extremely high. And that's usually what networks like Fox do is gather stats from the most down trodden group within a group, and project that as being representative of ALL.  It would be like me building unemployment stats amongst White Heroin addicts, and then presenting stats within that demographic as representing 'All whites'. That would not make sense, yet Fox, Bill and others do that all the time with 'blacks'. They sample the worst of the worst, then project those samples to audience as representing 'all'. It's a slimy thing to do, but they do it, cause they have always delighted in projecting the worst image of former slaves as humanly possible, under the guise of 'stats'. Anyways unlike Bill, and other commentators at Fox, I do have a day job were I actually do work, as such must end this post prematurely do to time constraints. I can't let Bill continue to get away with his crap. His platform is way way bigger than mine, but writing this might give others more clarity to this issue. More to follow as time allows. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 4, 2016 21:04:10 GMT -5
Why do guests bother going on Bill O'Reilly's show anymore when he never allows anyone else to speak or share information? If you want information about anything, I'd avoid Bills show cause all he does is talk over and narrate all and any guests own his show who don't mirror his exact same sentiments about any particular subject. And the only person on planet who you'll ever totally agree with all the time is 'self'. And is why hosts like Bill and Rush blab so much, but at least Bill O, has guests on, where as Rush Limbaugh just blabs on for hours, telling his audience how dumb they are and how they need him to decipher and make sense of the world for them. Bill will talk about ya, but at least he'll invite you on show to dispute his claims, where as Rush never invites people on his show whom he insults, as such they're not allowed to challenge or correct any false claims he makes. I never trust a persons intentions who never has guests on to challenge what they're saying. Both Bill and Rush have over inflated egos, but at least Bill will give those he slanders a chance to respond on show, but good luck getting any words in. I can't take Rush serious at all until he has on guests to defend themselves against the gross accusations he levels at them. All of these hosts are high and mighty as long as they control the content, mic and or studio. False Kingdoms.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 4, 2017 21:45:27 GMT -5
Bill O'Reilly is now on my radarView Attachment I just can no longer take the stupid things he says anymore on his show that go unchallenged. The suggestions he makes about others, without allowing those 'others' the opportunity to respond. And the few guest he does have on his show with more enlightened views, all he does is talk all over them, never lets them get in a full sentence, as if afraid his audience might learn what a electoral, ratings driven hack he really is. Remember this, the more TV or Radio talk show hosts talk over their guest, the more dishonest they are. They hide, bury, edit, what other people have to say, as if afraid it will expose their disingenuous ways. But on here, in the Zone...I control the mic, and will give Bill O'Reilly a taste of his own medicine... View Attachment Bill O'Reilly, the hostile, loud, commentator on Fox, is now facing years of soxual harassment accusations, and was absent from his show tonight as 20+ advertisers have pulled adds from his show. You're only as valuable to employer as long as can generate revenue for them, without revenue, you're simply dead weight to network, that being said can Bill O'Reilly ride this wave of accusations against him?, or will he go down like Bill Cosby? |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 4, 2017 21:53:47 GMT -5
With powerful partisan Billionairs getting into politics now, not even Bill O'Reilly is safe from their influence on company sponsorships, or these partisan billionairs ability to coherce people into 'lying' or 'exagerating' to bring down 'hosts'.
No one is safe from this now, not even Rush, or Savage...these behind the scene billionairs control and run a lot behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 19, 2017 19:08:35 GMT -5
With powerful partisan Billionairs getting into politics now, not even Bill O'Reilly is safe from their influence on company sponsorships, or these partisan billionairs ability to coherce people into 'lying' or 'exagerating' to bring down 'hosts'. No one is safe from this now, not even Rush, or Savage...these behind the scene billionairs control and run a lot behind the scenes. Looks like Bill O'Reilly's show on Fox has been canned! I wonder where Bill will go now?...back to radio?...who will hire him? Who would of ever thought Bill, the king of Fox, would get booted by de Fox, out the door, see ya, good-by!...wow. If it can happen to him, it can happen to anyone. At least he's rich and wealthy, he'll be just fine, it's us working type stiffs who struggle to make it day to day, that I worry about.. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 3, 2020 16:11:15 GMT -5
Bill O, is back, good grief Bill O is back, good grief, and at it again. They were canned from Fox News a few years ago fro allegedly smacking the behinds of women behind the scenes...Types like Bill will be types like Bill.. That aside, today they were on Hannities show, and what made me generate this post is want to demonstrate how embedded racist always claim 'I'm not racist', while saying things more racist than the Klan. Example. Of all the 'white' activist out there on the streets destroying stuff, Antifa, and other anarchist groups, supremist groups, and just rowdy bored white youth, of all the 'W' groups out there on streets destroying stuff, Bill O, had to end segment with Hannity by saying the following. 'Could you imagine this nation being ran by 'black lives matter?' Say what?? 1. Black lives matter created by white person. 2. You now have 'whites', dizzy headed whites holding up 'BLM' signs, but you don't see black folks themselves doing it. So why would Bill O ignore those facts? Cause the word 'Black' is a trigger word for closet racist, and he knows it....better to blame all this chaos on obscure BLM group, than to come to terms with the fact that it's now 'your kind', your hobbits, grand hobbits, out there on the streets tearing things up and shooting at cops. But no, keep your white viewers minds focused on hating and being sumicious of 'them blacks'. 1000 white anarchist could, and are burning down buildings, but according to former Fox News commentator Bill O, it's 'Dem blacks' that are doing it. Bill, You're back and so am I...hello. Welcome to the Zone, here we examine issues over weeks, months and years, rather in 3 second talk radio sound bites.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Sept 9, 2020 16:46:07 GMT -5
Sorry Bill O', the Northern soldiers in Union war were not fighting to free the slaves, if that's all the war was about hardly any of them would of signed up to fight, stop spreading revisionist history Bill!! Those 'W' union soldiers, if fighting the civil war, simply to 'free those poor negro slaves', than why was racism, after the war just as previlent up North as it was in the South? Do you think we're that stupid out here Billy O'? If you could resurect any Union soldier from the civil war, do you really think any of them would tell you they were fighting to free a people they to held their noses up to?? Sure, the freeing of the slaves was a consequence of the north winning, but not the sole purpose. No longer you're no longer on fox if you got away with telling these types of lies in order to sell books, but not here billy o, not here, the buck stops here,...welcome to 'The Zone'...
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on May 23, 2021 15:44:52 GMT -5
Some may not like Bill the Fox commentator, but Bill the Historian is a different creature and his book 'Killing the Mob' is a excellent read! www.globalinsanity.earth/books/killing-the-mob-bill-o'reilly/ People change, times change, times have changed, and Bill, well, they're the author of many books, but this one here 'Killing the Mob', I happen to like and am currently reading.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on May 23, 2021 15:48:08 GMT -5
I may have to re invent both Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck in that both have changed a lot since 2013...the Zone hasn't changed, but they have
People change, the Zone doesn't change, but other people do in the real world, as such it may confuse people to read a 2015 Bill O'Reilly compared to the more laid back Bill of today, and the same with Glenn Beck, the Glen B of 2013 is not the same Glenn Beck of 2021.
So I may or may not give both men a fresh start, not sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 23, 2021 4:14:26 GMT -5
After reading more chapters in Bills Book 'Killing the Mob', I wonder how he could of spent all those years on Fox making it seem as if only black folks committed crimes, while never talking about all the cocaine and heroin and other drugs were being imported into the cities, not by black folks, but by the Italian mob.
How could Bill of kept all that secret all those years on Fox?
I mean I'm glad he's telling the truth about it now, but my gosh.
And talk about 'sleaze', Clinton had nothing on the Kennedy Brothers who openly and behind closed doors had affairs with mistresses, Marilyn Monroe and others, who herself was strung out on drugs in the end.
And the associations the Mob had with high ranking LEO, and it just goes on and on, and how Hoover, the former FBI director would illegally wire tape civilians, and also had wire taps on both the Kennedy brothers, that he used as leverage against them.
I mean how could anyone say the FBI ect, didn't become corrupt or politicized until Obama came around, how could conservatives, who claim to be so into history and smart, not know that the Justice Department has always been corruptable, and did things that were shady for political reasons.
I mean this book 'Killing the Mob' is like a history book, and cause the mob was entangled with every aspect of life back then, you cannot tell the mobs stories without weaving other peoples or agency's or studios or Hollywood into it as well.
When was America wholesome again?
All this while Leave it to Beaver being filmed, which the mafia probably bankrolled, according to this book, since movies weren't really made without their approval, since they ran the labor union and other unions that made the film industry possible.
I'm almost done with the book but learned more about history than I thought I would, things I possibly suspected but that this carefully researched book confirms.
I still like this country, or at least the region I came from, which was a smaller place and indeed pretty much wholesome, but to pretend all of America was this big wholesome warehouse of grit and honesty is a stretch, well I guess the common folk have always worked hard, but behind the scenes, be it politicians or the mob, which now today seems to have been replaced by lobbyist and ' big tech' and special interest, behind the scenes, just like in the 50's and 60's, they're calling the shots and giving the illusion that we the people are in control, ye right.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 23, 2021 4:18:54 GMT -5
After reading more chapters in Bills Book 'Killing the Mob', I wonder how he could of spent all those years on Fox making it seem as if only black folks committed crimes, while never talking about all the cocaine and heroin and other drugs were being imported into the cities, not by black folks, but by the Italian mob. How could Bill of kept all that secret all those years on Fox? I mean I'm glad he's telling the truth about it now, but my gosh. And talk about 'sleaze', Clinton had nothing on the Kennedy Brothers who openly and behind closed doors had affairs with mistresses, Marilyn Monroe and others, who herself was strung out on drugs in the end. And the associations the Mob had with high ranking LEO, and it just goes on and on, and how Hoover, the former FBI director would illegally wire tape civilians, and also had wire taps on both the Kennedy brothers, that he used as leverage against them. I mean how could anyone say the FBI ect, didn't become corrupt or politicized until Obama came around, how could conservatives, who claim to be so into history and smart, not know that the Justice Department has always been corruptable, and did things that were shady for political reasons. I mean this book 'Killing the Mob' is like a history book, and cause the mob was entangled with every aspect of life back then, you cannot tell the mobs stories without weaving other peoples or agency's or studios or Hollywood into it as well. When was America wholesome again? All this while Leave it to Beaver being filmed, which the mafia probably bankrolled, according to this book, since movies weren't really made without their approval, since they ran the labor union and other unions that made the film industry possible. I'm almost done with the book but learned more about history than I thought I would, things I possibly suspected but that this carefully researched book confirms. I still like this country, or at least the region I came from, which was a smaller place and indeed pretty much wholesome, but to pretend all of America was this big wholesome warehouse of grit and honesty is a stretch, well I guess the common folk have always worked hard, but behind the scenes, be it politicians or the mob, which now today seems to have been replaced by lobbyist and ' big tech' and special interest, behind the scenes, just like in the 50's and 60's, they're calling the shots and giving the illusion that we the people are in control, ye right. Ye, when racists controlled and ran the press back then, of course they're not going to tell the truth, just like today, conservatives know what it was like to be 'black' in the 60's, in that the media today spins stories their way to make conservatives look bad, so one can't imagine a more collectively racist America, back then, doing the same against 'black folks'? If the Mafia even controlled and influenced the media, why would they blame themselves on all the drugs on the streets, so of course they blamed the 'black man', back then and still do. Man has been spinning things to suit his political or religious needs for 1000's of years, so it's really nothing new, this tact and behavior. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 23, 2021 17:10:32 GMT -5
Bill O'Reilly makes another typical conservative blunder today when it comes to crime and crime stats While on Hannity's show, Bill blurted out... 'There's no crime in Wyoming cause everyone there, or high % of people own guns, therefore criminals just keep moving right alonge' Says the Bill O'Reilly..hmm OK, fine, I'll give him that there may not be many home invasion type of crimes, where criminal breaks into someone's home and either steals from them or robs them, but to say there's no crime in Wyoming, is that true? And if there's no crime in Wyoming, than why not dismantle the State Police, the local Sheriff offices and city Police, I mean according to Mr Bill O'Reilly, if there's no crime just do away with the Police all together. Fact is, there is crime in Wyoming, as in all other States and parts of the world, as long as you have humans, you will have crime. Don't believe me, than read this 'Crime Stat Report' from the State of Wyoming, right out of the horses mouth.. www.cityrating.com/crime-statistics/wyoming/#:~:text=Property%20and%20Violent%20Crime%20%20%20%202019,%20%206%2C984%20%207%20more%20rows%20 Let's see... 1. Rapes = 324, reported 2. Motor vehicle theft = 713 reported 3. Larceny and Theft = 934 4. Property crime = 9093 5. Violent crime = 1258 reported And I'll stop there. The list is far more extensive and doesn't even cover cyber type crimes and other white collar type of crimes, but I'll stop there. But do you see how even conservatives who claim to be so 'accurate' with information, still manage to 'spin' things to suit their own interests. Sorry people, the Zone is here to tell you, yes, there is crime, even in Wyoming.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 1, 2023 13:16:58 GMT -5
Bill O'Reily, if you think Micheal Obama will run for President, than at least on this one issue, you're a political dunce.
|
|
