When talk show hosts like Hannity, and talk radio zealots like Rush and Savage become the face of the Republican party, it's no wonder President Obama won two national elections, and the way things are going looks like Hillary win in 2016.
All she has to do is sit back all allow Fox News and their commentators, Hannity being chief amongst them, all she has to do is sit back and allow Hannity and others to annoy the hell out of the general voting public, then Hillary will be a shoe in in 2016.
Hannity comes off as an adult hissy fit brat, and more and more people, even on the right, are beginning to see how destructive his personality is to their campaigns.
Hillary will win in 2016, not cause she's so great and wonderful, but rather cause people will cast their vote for her just to see the humiliation on Hannity's face the next day.
Hannity's brand of media conservatism is one of the biggest destructive forces to the GOP in the last 20 years.
Last Edit: May 14, 2015 22:24:43 GMT -5 by X factor
Time allowing, I'll expose Hannity's false narrative that either innocent citizens have to allow police to abuse them physically, violate civil rights or put up with violent extreme crime is hideous, a hideous dishonest narrative.
Time allowing I'll expose Sean for the snake he is, and others who believe this.
They're basically saying either let cops beat the F out of you, even when handcuffed, or put up with no policing at all.
You can never trust a hack, especially a political one, cause they're always all over the map when it comes to principle and values, depending on whom they're defending.
I really don't like wasting my time with hacks like Hannity, cause I know deep down inside he, they, know it's all a scam, a formula, a way to generate ratings and views.
And they've perfected it to a art form, the art or form of 'agitation' just for the sake of.
He agitates those who don't like him, knowing they'll tune in to wait for him to fall, but he also agitates his fans and admirers by acting as 'moral guide' to them and pointing out apparent flaws in others, as if to say See audience, if I weren't here to point out other peoples flaws, you all are to stupid to see them on your own, as such I'm your savior'... ...really?...only to dumb people who never read the bible or had good parents I suppose.
Campaign season has begun, and politics, and politicians set out to condescend to the American voters.
Hannity being a hack, is not looking out for common sense people, rather he's looking out for shows ratings.
As such has become a parrot bird and must repeat certain things over and over again, not cause he believes them to be true, but rather cause the audience he has created must hear these things from him in order to stay stimulated
One quick example of what a hack like Hannity does in as far as politics goes.
On one hand, under Bush, Hannity the hack kept saying 'Government doesn't create jobs, people create jobs'.
But now suddenly under President Obama, It's the President who's soley responsible for job growth or decline in America.
Then on show today touted how a certain GOP Governor, who's now running for Pres, created 100,000 jobs in his state.
Conservatives always tout the fact that Government doesn't create jobs, yet come campaign season Hannity the hack boasts that his GOP Governors have?
So umm, was President right when he said 'You didn't build that'....?
Which is it Hannity the hack, does Government build, create jobs or do people build, create jobs?
And where do banks come into play here, and how banks loan out money?
All I can say is if people get their news and information from Hannity the ratings driven hack, I feel for you.
Hannity the hack deliberately creates racial division on his show, for ratings, has no interest in real political victory
Sorry, but today I actually had to turn radio off, while listening to Hannity the hacks show, while he aired the most ugly, viscous comments from Farrikan and some other out cast Muslim Panther leader.
I couldn't listen to it, and found the airing of these to men to be disgusting and ratings driven, and divisive.
It would be equivalent to MSNBC (which I do not get on current cable package) finding the most extreme white supremicst group, airing their speech, then telling audience 'this is how all white people thing, this is how all those on the right think, how all GOP think'.
Hannity is a hack, and is out for self, out for ratings, he's in the entertainment business first, and only pretends to care about politics second, and only for ratings, other wise he would not air such garbage, he, and others in that medium, would not give obscure voices like Farrakan ect, national air time, for millions to hear.
All that does is create division.
Most whites, most in Hannity's audience, do not live or interact with 'blacks' or people of color on daily basis, as such their only impression, view, image, of 'blacks' ect they get is from the media, from Fox, CNN talk radio.
So when they hear stuff like this, Farrakan's rage, they can't help but think 'All blacks believe the same'.
And can't help but then build resentment on the inside towards fellow citizens.
What Hannity the hack did today was reckless and totally ratings driven...equivalent to political porn.
Sometimes I thing they're all in it together, Farrakan, Al Sharpton and Fox, cause not even CNN airs Farakan speeches or 'The new black panthers' speeches, but Fox certainly does, and talk radio hosts do, but only for 'shock' value, and nothing else.
But they are destroying unity amongst citizens by doing so.
If you are a Conservative and think Hannity is your friend, you're a fool.
And then wonder why when GOP gets elected, nothing ever changes.
One day, hopefully some will realize what a sham it all is, this whole split and divide strategy, this whole 'The left' BS, invisible enemy, while the true enemy does it's deed.
Hannity, the Fox News hack, asked Donald Trump a very hackish question today on his TV show during interview.
Hannity the Hack asked Donald Trump the following question.
'Mr Trump,if Jeb Bush were to get the nomination, would you support him? (duh)
What's wrong with that question?
And why would Hannity the hack ask Donald Trump such a question when all polls known to man have Donald Trump leading the whole GOP pack in double digits?
Trumps like in the 40% favorability numbers amongst potential voters, and Jeb Bush is like less than 7% on average with potential voters..
So wouldn't it make more sense for Hannity the hack to ask Jeb Bush if he would be willing to support Trump, should Trump get party nomination?
Is Hannity the hack to stupid to remember the televised pledge Trump already gave months ago to support eventual parties nomination?
So if Trump already signed the pledge, why do stupid news correspondence on Fox still feel the need to ask him if he'll support eventual nominee of party, if not himself?
Why would they keep asking him that stupid mindless question??
Why why why???, ask yourself.
Who do they work for and who keeps telling them to ask these stupid questions of Trump?
What has the Zone always said?, the proof is in the putting.
Why do they keep asking the front runner, Trump, if he'll support some looser candidate at 1% in polls, but not other way around??
The question should be, for those who have brains and common sense and not owned or paid by secret powers, the question should be to other candidates...
Will you Jeb Bush, will you Carly F, will you Ted Cruz, will you Rich Perry, will you Scott Walker, will you Mike Huckabee and all the rest, will all of you support Donald Trump if and win he wins parties nomination??
That's the question, and if they're not asking that question, than something is rigged, meaning someone somewhere, already knows the outcome.
And that indeed is, would be scary.
Last Edit: Oct 21, 2015 17:03:06 GMT -5 by X factor
Unlike Hannity the big fat hack, I won't sit here and disagree with Hillary Clinton, play politics, just cause she happen to say something true about urban youth in gangs back in the 1990's and that still applies today.
And that is she labeled the violent, now mostly extinct or prisoned, inner city youth of the 90's as
'Super predators', and you know what, she's Gd right!
That's what they were, and still are, and just cause Hillary Clinton said it doesn't mean it's wrong.
Unlike Hannity the Hack though, my thoughts aren't steered by Slavic party loyalty so I'm free to speak common sense without the political ratings driven muck.
Here's what I can't stand about phony fake Fox News supposed value driven conservatism, is that it isn't!
Any other time Hannity the hack and all his buddies on that show would be attacking any 'black lives matter' disruption to a GOP campaign, but cause it occurred to Hillary, now Hannity the hack practically applauds the protester and distorts Hillary's words.
Hillary Clinton never once used the words 'Black' when describing the predatory behavior of gangs in the 90's, yet lying azz fake media cons make it seem as if she did, as if 'blacks' are to stupid to do own research.
Politics makes people very dishonest, and rather than be honest about what Hillary meant, Hannity the Hack bends her words, cause maybe he thinks it will insult a few 'blacks' to now suddenly vote Rep?
When politics comes before politics, it creates hacks like Hannity, who if away from the Mic, didn't screen his calls so closely, would get intellectually crushed if conversation allowed to go on past a few seconds.
And sorry 'black lives matter' hired hens...Hillary was right, gangs do have predatory behavior, just ask all their dead victims.
Last Edit: May 9, 2016 20:44:49 GMT -5 by X factor
Hannity, one of the dumbest or condescending radio hosts of all time
Typical stupid question of Hannity...
Err, duh, is your life better now than it was in 2008 before President Barrack Obama was elected...err, duh
First off you hack, the day to day outcome or direction of my life, decisions I make, and people I encounter have zero to do with any elected President or politician.
My life, job, personal fortune or misfortune has zero to do with current President or one before him.
Sometimes I thrived under Bush, other times I dived, but it was always dependent on my own personal decisions, good or bad, and not some 'President effect' over my own personal life.
Only a fool would think President effects day to day prosperity or out come in life.
Same with current President Obama...under him I thrive or dive based on my own decisions in life, and happen chance.
In know way shape or form can I attribute President Obama being in office having any effect on anything in personal life...not happiness, not prosperity, sadness, anger, opportunity ect...nothing.
And most peoples lives are lived the same.
What effects our lives, determines whether gets better or not, is us, not some Fox News commentator, or the President.
Wonder how Hannity the Hack will respond when many happen to fall or dive under Trump? Will Hannity the hack blame Trump for their poor decisions or will Hannity the hack blame them for not making better personal decision?
Hannity the Hack uses same cartoonish method to racialize progress in America.
These generic stats that claim 'blacks' doing worse under President Obama, and not taking into account other factors other than ones generic skin designation, like own personal habits, or immigrant workers, over seas out sourcing ect.
No 'black' person is simply unemployed because their 'black', if so that would imply that 'white' employers are deliberately keeping 'blacks' out of workforce simply for being 'black'.
Stats based on very general generic racial designations are totally meaningless to me, and others who are honest. They have no meaning unless delve deeper into persons life to see what specifically prevents them from being hired or looking for or wanting to find a job....if one did so one would see color has the least to do with it!
But then again these talk radio shows are ran on like a 8th grade or less level, and the hosts routinely condescend to their listeners intellect, and actually depends on audience being dumb in order to be effective.
Bottom line, successful people and companies have always gotten ahead and thrived, regardless of who's in office.
And those who fail, stumble, and politicize their miss steps, will forever blame opposing political party for their own personal short comings.
Then you have ratings driven talk show hacks like Hannity who capitalize on the emotions of their target audience by constantly agitating them with negative bad news, simply for ratings.
Ask Hannity or Levin or Rush or Savage have their personal fortunes gotten worse or better over the last 8 years, and the answer they give you is all you need to know about these lying ratings driven snakes.
Last Edit: May 9, 2016 20:45:16 GMT -5 by X factor
Hannity the hack was pitching these establishment candidates down your throat before Trump entered the race
With the exception of Trump, Dr Ben Carson...and possible Rand Paul, all of these candidates are establishment hacks.
Mike Huckabee is not a hack, but is more fitted for being President of a ministry, not nation.
Chris Christie is not a hack either, the Governor of Wisconsin a fighter, but to goofy to ever win national election.
And Trump eliminated the guy with the big owl glasses from day one practically.
All that aside, for years Hannity the hack and his talk radio cohorts have been trying to mainly shove Rubio, Bush and Cruz down peoples throats.
All of which the American people, voters, rejected!
Yet talk radio hosts like Hannity the hack already appointed them to be your next leader, yet the Republican electorate booted them all out of the race.
Cause the Republican electorate, the rank and file, instinctively know that all of them owned by same bankers, donors, global investors.
No one goes to D.C. to stand up for small town values...there's no money in that.
Donors don't donate millions to campaigns just for candidate to not spend money, just the opposite, they donate to candidates so that when elected said candidate will pipeline as much money to them as possible, under different programs, grants, this funding, that funding...why do you think spending never goes down regardless of who's in office.
Always blaming it on 'The left' as Hannity the hack does, all that does is provide cover to his pals, to milk the people.
Labels like 'The left', simply make it harder to identify those hurting you, the nation.
Rush and Hannity have done nothing but provide cover to those who are sucking the life out of nation, for years, by constantly blaming all things on 'The left', there by giving people with bad intent on 'The right' free reign to do their dirt behind the scenes.
Talk radio hosts do not, never have had, your best interest at hand, the sooner you realize that the better.
Today, in the news cycle, and on various so called 'right wing' radio shows, I heard something appauling that made me a bit sad, and that is when I heard either Barbara Boxer or Dian Fienstien (how ever it's spelled), were booed at a Democratic convention in California, mainly by disgruntled Bernie Sanders supporters.
(The same ones, of the same spirit, that crashed Trumps rally in Chicago months ago)
Now because I'm a person of solid consistent principle, and not a hack, like Hannity, I felt bad for the lady.
I would of felt bad for any older lady, regardless of party, who after so many years of working hard for causes they believe in their heart were worthy causes, to get on stage in older years and be booed and disrespected by younger crowed who have yet to do anything to change the world other than be born.
Principles = respecting your elders regardless, show respect and kindness
Hannity the hack = Cheering bad behavior from others as long as it benefits your cause.
On Hannity's show today, he said "I enjoyed that', meaning he celebrated rude nasty behavior as long as it was directed at someone he didn't like.
Sorry, but that's not principle, at least not a loving Godly principle...maybe a Satanic principle, but not a Godly one.
Hannity, and many shows like his, are 'Anti-Christ' shows, in my opinion, in that they have hi-jacked what it means to be 'good', and they worship at the throne of politics, and ratings driven shows.
A person of principle would be saddened and disturbed to see any women in age, booed at and disrespected, and 'Love' would naturally make one want to shield that lady, cause 'Love' is not dependent on another's actions or their belief, rather Love is about what's in your heart.
And today (like many others) Hannity has proven that whatever's in their heart isn't Love...rather some self serving spirit that has nothing to do with the biblical new testament God or salvation.
Conservatism, as presented by Hannity and others of his ilk, has become Christianity's Anti-Christ.
Political Conservatism has zero to do with salvation, or cleansing of the heart, but pretends to, and directly competes with religion, has basically become one, but all it really produces is self righteous monsters.
Last Edit: May 16, 2016 16:42:45 GMT -5 by X factor
Funny, sad and pathetic how now Hannity and others who trashed, demeaned President Obama for 8 straight years, now try to take moral high ground. Sorry, but to me, they have no moral high ground to demonstrate as examples will follow
For 8 straight years, and more, this is what President Obama, and or those who share his DNA have had to endure from the so called 'Loving color blind, non racist 'right')...ye OK
Yet now that Trumps in office (whom I supported) all those who railed against President Obama now suddenly want to act 'civil' and tell others to..huh?
I mean if you all can't, did not, even try to set any example of civility, what moral ground do you now have to tell others to???
For 8 straight years nothing but racist remarks against President Obama; Rush Limbaugh refered to his admin as 'Regime'.
No one on in the media right objected.
Yet others created rumors that Michelle Obama was really a 'man', or Transvestite, again, no one in the media right refuted that.
I have 8 years of verbal ammo, your own words, pictures and images, of the worst kind, aimed at President Obama.
Glenn Beck (talk radio host) calling him the anti Christ, Savage (Jewish radio host) telling listeners that President Obama would force a 3rd term, Savage called him a 'demon' and worse.
24 hours a day of radio hosts stirring up nothing but hate towards elected President.
Do you now think I'll forget that or others?
Again, I supported and voted for Trump, but not do to hatred towards Obama.
I'm not a talk radio stooge, I actually do believe in things that work and are efficient.
I do not come from the 'deplorable' batch of Trump supporters, rather I come from the fair, honorable and respectable side of Trump supporters, people with class, who aren't motivated by hate or bigotry.
I like Trump cause he's honest.
I despise talk radio hosts, or those brainwashed by such, cause they are not honest.
In following posts, you will see that indeed 'the right' can be, and was, very racist, ugly, unfair and mean, towards P Obama, his wife and even kids.
As such they have no moral high ground to stand on, as if to suddenly try to erase last 8 years of the most ugly vile sentiment ever aimed at any U.S. President prior...
Here, on Hannity's thread, you'll be reminded of that from time to time, as Hannity, and other hosts, now try to pretend that only 'Libs' out of power are capable of being mean spirited.
Here, the truth and only the truth.
I'm not Lib, Con, Right or Left...
I just like honesty from all.
to be continued.
Last Edit: Jan 10, 2017 21:31:06 GMT -5 by X factor