'Black' = 'Void'....Tribe, Nation = Identity, and role...

Odd how most 'Pro black' types are actually lighter skinned or mixed...like Mohammad Ali above, or Malcom X, who was considered 'Red', or Ice T, very very light skinned rapper who rapped about pro black stuff.

Seems most who are 'pro black' tend to be of a lighter skin tone, and darker types just seem mean, bitter, and uninterested in anything positive related to 'black'.



seems the loudest proponents of 'black power' or 'black liberation' actually seem to be those of very light or mixed skin tone.

Yet those of very dark African skin tone seem to be very indifferent to any kind of 'black unity' type of movement, and instead always seem to walk around bitter at everyone, the world, and especially those of lighter skin tone than them.

There has to be a phycology behind this, maybe one we'll explore and try to figure out in a later post.

Black females miss the high servant status colonial America gave them in the past, still shows in how black female cashier treat white costumers vs non white costumers



'You like that girl, you like touching and stroking my white clean toes and feet?

'Yes sa ma'am, I'ze love stroking yo nice cleans white's feets, laters I'll bathe you in soapy wata, if ya's don't mind ma'am'

Black females still messaging the feet of their formers masters in a variety of ways.

If there's ever a revolution, black females are to be trusted less than any other group of people, at least the colonial American kind.

Many people of color find the whole 'Black Lives Matter' slogan to be very insulting and degrading

alteredstatesdotblog.wordpress.com/2020/06/07/power-over-you-the-failed-long-term-effects-of-b-lives-matter-slogan/

I mean if you have to force others to admit you matter, than it means you really don't.

And it also allows others to control you emotionally, if they think you don't matter to yourself, unless you matter to them.

No other peoples on the whole planet Earth, insist on being defined by a 'color'...in fact most find it offensive, like Native American Indians, they have tribes, Navajo or Apache, or this or that, and with tribal names comes an identity.

To me, American former slaves the only ones on planet who insist on being defined by a color, which equals a void, rather than tribal identity.

No wonder so much chaos within 'them'....without sound cultural heritage, one is lost, a people is lost.

Black still = void and when defined as a void, that void can be filled with anything

Take for example women.

Before slaves, certain women were 'queens' of Africa, where elephants, and other majestic animals use to reign.

But now whenever you turn on the TV and watch biographies, or nature shows, it's always some skinny, Ivy League 'white lady', teaching every one else about nature and conservations and all.

And now black women, when turn on TV, always shown as creatures of colonialism, stripped of past, and re made in the image of 'convenience', other peoples convenience.

So few of you will get that.

But how you're, or how 'one' is, or even how 'a people' are defined really does matter.

People who define themselves as 'black'---

There's usually not much there beyond basic emotions.

Cause if one defines self as black, what does that mean?, how does one allow self to be emotionally programed?

If defined as a 'void' what does that do to ones concept of self?

Seems if defined as 'black' in political sense than seems one destined to walk around rest of life with 'chip on shoulder'

1. All whites are bad, evil, and are racist and therefore owe me, owe my 'feelings' to go out of their way to prove to me that they're not bad or racist.

Well that to is a void that can never be filled.

You cannot fill voids whether defined as one or whether define others as.

I try to engage people, women, who define selves as 'black', and there's just nothing there, black is not a 'culture', it's a political mindset, a social construct for the purpose of marginalizing a whole people.

A 'class stutus' seperation type thing.

Why do you think Indians, Native Americans don't call themselves 'Red'?

Cause 'Red' is a marginalized term applied onto them by colonial powers and strips anyone called that of their history, culture, and individuality.

The same with 'white', but in the past, and even now, the term 'white' tends to have a positive conitation behind it, in that most usually think good traits before they think bad traits...

There is power in definitions and for the life of me cannot figure while a whole people or various identities would allow selves to be defined as one big generic void.

To be continued as time allows.