|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 7, 2021 13:06:12 GMT -5
Black females miss the high servant status colonial America gave them in the past, still shows in how black female cashier treat white costumers vs non white costumers 'You like that girl, you like touching and stroking my white clean toes and feet?'Yes sa ma'am, I'ze love stroking yo nice cleans white's feets, laters I'll bathe you in soapy wata, if ya's don't mind ma'am'Black females still messaging the feet of their formers masters in a variety of ways. If there's ever a revolution, black females are to be trusted less than any other group of people, at least the colonial American kind. Weird, I mean back in those days romantic black/white relationships against the law, literally against statutes written in the law, as applied to heterosoxualism, but I guess if a black woman, and white female, there was no law stating they couldn't get cozy together. I wonder, back then, how many 'white' mistresses, got 'Lesbian' with their 'butch' black female maids back then while Husband away at work. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 7, 2021 17:15:38 GMT -5
Is this black culture?  Is this 'black culture'?, where now the females more 'butch' than the males? I took this photo today at fuel station and noticed large NFL line man sized 'B' female getting their turbo hot rod Dodge Challenger detailed. Where I grew up it was the men, the older macho men who drove the hot rods, but in modern urban areas it's now 'Butch' black females who are more likely to be behind the wheels of super charged hot rods, and I find that gross, cause I like contrast. I'd probably find it more 'soxy' if a petite slender female drove a hot rod, rather than woman pictured above, cause I like contrast. But this is what I mean, this is not culture to me, if anything it's a symptom of not having a culture or being robbed of one for so long, and so virus mindsets or trends begin do to lack of real solid value orientated historical culture. Sorry, but there are guys, males, I'd rather date, hold hands with, whom I find much more 'fem' than women in above picture. The above 'culture' is not mine, where women are the 'beast' and men are nuetralized, just not my culture. I'll date a petite, fem girly crossdressing or sissy male before date that lady above, who'd probably beat me up if made one mistake and then drive over me with their hot rod. Clothing on all crooked and all, no way man...no way.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 14, 2021 1:01:09 GMT -5
Even though a person of color, I can never be 'black', cause I actually have a past, culture and a history
I know that sounds odd and weird, but I tried being 'black' once, and there was nothing there, just anger and resentment for basically being a 'no one'...a void, which anyone, including history, could fill with anything.
Is why whenever I'm around others or another, who see themselves as 'black', there's really just nothing there, like an empty shell, no humor, no laughter nothing, a void.
Or you have to be in this ramped up activist mode all the time, accusing others of being 'bad' and not liking you, but what that does is tears up your own insides, and soon you begin to hate yourself as much as you think others do, it's a phycological effect.
I talk to women who think they're black...nothing...blank look in face if steer away from artificial black issues.
Then I talk to women who are Hispanic, or Native American or who have a larger sense of self, and it's such a different experience, they have spirit, soul, laughter, wit and more.
(And they don't hate their men, as 'black' women do, for if hate self, of course going to hate those who you think are you or look like you)
Then I speak with a cashier who only sees themself as 'black', and again, nothing there, a flat note.
I actually say this to help people, in that if define self as a color, what does that mean?
Same with 'white' in some cases, although in the past at least, being referred to as 'white' had many positive conitations attatched to it, it meant socially that you weren't 'black' and therefore didn't have to justify self, cause by default, you were whole.
That being said, still, there's a difference between a person who sees self as just 'white', vs someone who sees self as an Italian, or Irish, or Greek, the conversations you have with a Italian or Irish or Greek run much deeper than someone just trained to see self as 'white'...a generic term, just like black.
I can never be just 'white' or 'black' or 'red', or 'yellow', cause I have culture, those are all terms others invented to diminish who you are.
Some will get that, others will never get that.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 14, 2021 1:07:19 GMT -5
They tried that crap with Native American Indians, but they rejected that definition quickly, and is why Native Americans still refer to selves as proper tribal identities, like Cherokee, or Seminole, and reject football names like 'The Redskins'...why?, cause they totally understand everything written above this post...they get it.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 20, 2021 8:12:15 GMT -5
People who think of themselves as 'black' are as small to me as a 'racist' is, cause they both have the same type of mentality.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 20, 2021 8:14:44 GMT -5
I stopped trying to be 'black' over a decade ago, and to this day still don't know what that means or where it leads to, other than a void...a empty space, a hole that can never be filled or satisfied.
I want nothing to do with such an identity.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Feb 21, 2021 15:50:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 31, 2021 20:56:02 GMT -5
Well I to am not black then
Well I to am not 'black' then cause like others, I don't know what it means to be defined as a 'color' or a void.
And I notice when defined as 'black' in today's world, people automatically 'cringe' when or if they think that's what you are...here's what they automatically think.
1. Close minded and angry
2. No education, and low comprehensive mental skills
3. Proned to violence, if a male and proned to being loud, if a female
4. If a female, than on Gov assistance, if a male, than on probation
5. Smell
And I could go on and on, so if some one, even other blacks or people of color, think you're 'black', they automatically toss you into this gigantic generic bucket of negative stereotypes.
And you have to spend hours, days, weeks, years, decades, proving to them you're 'self' and no one else.
And actually it's other blacks who come from violent urban areas who can be some of the most 'racist' towards others they consider 'black'.
They just assume since they're 'hood', than all other black folks must be hood also, they have no idea about 'black folks' who live in rural Idaho or Montana or Nebraska.
So ye, I'm not a color, I'm a personality, and this personality built on real life experience.
Sorry if that rubs some the wrong way.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 26, 2021 14:27:58 GMT -5
The term 'Black' as a way of describing another, still annoys me
I mean what is 'black'?, other than one of many colors in a color spectrum.
There's no tribe in Africa or all the planet Earth named 'black'.
Seems generic designation for others didn't really come about until European expansion, where explorers, found it easier to just broadly label certain tribes, or peoples of certain areas as one big 'color' or other word, as to denigrate their cultural past, whom the settlers didn't care about at all.
Although I do believe it was a college profession of African ancestry who termed the modern term 'Black'...instead of 'Negro', which also means black but in Spanish...that makes zero sense to me.
Negro and Black have the same exact meaning but in different languages...huh, what, duh?
'Colored'?...I actually prefer that term cause in implies plurality, I'd actually rather be 'colored' than to be known as 'white' or 'black'.
But that aside 'black' makes no sense to me cause is it??
1. A political designation?
2. DNA molecular make up?
3. A unique experience one has to have?
4. A culture?, mindset?
5. A lower class designation by those who consider themselves dominent? (both on the left and right)(and both sides of political spectrum forever love always doing research and 'stats' on those they consider 'black'..think about that, when one group of people always feel another peoples is there to be studied and measured, it's like they see you as some forever experiment, like rats in a lab)
It's actually a subtle form of 'Supremacy' to always feel 'these people here' need to be forever studied and evaluated.
And we all hear it in the news daily, from NPR to CNN to Fox and or Labs or scientists the quote.
Examples
'White scientist at the lab of whatever, say 'blacks' more likely to die of this, more likely to have broken homes, more likely to suffer from this, less likely to succeed at that'..... and so forth and so on...it never stops.
People are obscessed with studying this generic class of human known as 'black', is why I always say when allow self to be defined as a 'void' it allows others to fill that void with whatever they want, and it usually isn't good.
_________________________________________________
And one more thing, 'America' is not a 'race', nor is Germany or France ect.
I hate it when people say they're part this nation or that nation, while thinking they're really describing their genetic make up.
Being part Britain and part German makes zero scientific sense.
That's like someone in America saying 'I'm part Idaho, and part New York'...huh?
Yet no one ever calls people out on this academic stupidity other than here in the Zone which is a place like no other, cause here we're not afraid to think, educate, play, challenge learn and grow.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on May 24, 2021 6:56:09 GMT -5
What is 'black'? (there was never a tribe or nation in Africa named 'black') As applied to people it is a out dated colonial era generic designation. When people are defined or described as a 'void'...it allows people to fill that void with anything they want. And over the next few posts...I want to recatigorize people of African heritage...or 'Americanized Africans' based on individual behavior, rather than some colonial style generic color designation. I will come up with new tribes, to replace the lost ones...based on behavior, status, and ethics embraced by individuals... When slaves first arrived to the Americas, they were stripped of all past identities...thus recreated in the nightmarish image of their captures. Re defined through the lens of those who had disdain for them. Stripped of language and culture...and turned into a generic void... A generic people... Well I'm here to say that people are not generic...everyone has individual traits. The greatest gift of life is individuality... When robbed of that individuality, and lumped into some generic bucket...bad things occur. New Tribal definitions to follow... View Attachment(click to enlarge) Beautiful African Coastline...nature needs nothing from man... This is just as true now as it was 8 years ago in 2013. Ask any person who is defined as 'black', how online, when others cannot tell what ethnicity they are or color how they're treated one way when perceived to be 'white' or 'Anglo', and how treated another way, discarded, dismissed, mocked, ect, when it is found out they're 'black' or defined as such. The 'black' person didn't change, what changed was how the other person perceives them, the 'shift' occurred in the other persons mind ect. Is why when a person calls into a radio show who doesn't sound stereotypical 'black', you'll notice the host will ask 'May I ask your color?'..and if they say they're white, the host makes adjustments in their mind, and if they say they're black, the host also makes adjustments in their minds and begins to fill that 'blackness' with their own loaded assumptions about the caller. 'Black' is a void, which allows other people to fill said void with their own 'filling', whatever traits they want, and it doesn't matter whether those traits apply to 'you' or not, cause when defined as 'black' others get to define you and you don't get to define yourself. And we see this played out over and over and over again. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on May 28, 2021 2:53:12 GMT -5
As a male, I think I'm more Hispanic than black, or even more Native American than black
Here's what I've noticed over the years, and that is women who only define themselves as 'black' are some of the most dull bland people on all the planet earth, I mean there's just nothing there other than 'activism' and anger.
but women who define themselves as Caribean, or Hispanic or African, or Greek, or Italian dark, or whatever, now they always seem to have personality traits I like cause they have a much larger sense of self.
But like Southern Black women who's families never left the South, and so still see themselves as nothing more than 'black', are some of the most dull, uninteresting type of women I've ever met on all of planet Earth, I need a woman who has a larger identity other than a singular color
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jun 20, 2021 10:30:59 GMT -5
'Black' is not a culture, it's a struggle
'Black' is not a culture, it's a struggle.
'Black' is like a parasite that emerges from it's host, and that host is 'whiteness'.
Like in the movie 'Aliens'.
What I'm saying is 'Black' is a total creation of white society and Supremacy and so forth.
When Africans first brought to America, stripped of all ancestor ways, languages, thoughts, ect, stripped of it all, and for 400 years told were nothing, nobodies and that only purpose in life was to serve 'Master' and whites, for 400 years this went on, until no culture left at all, other than the culture of slavery.
So when slavery did end, the people that were free had zero to do with the people who were captured centuries earlier, even though yes, new slaves brought over even up until the bitter end, many going to South America ect.
But if stripped of language, heritage, spirituality, other than the 'white mans' version of Christanity which told you if a slave, to stay in your place, but if stripped of all of that, what are you?, what are we?...a void...thus the term 'black' which I so despise more and more.
No one else on the planet is defined as a void other than former and freed slaves in America, and as a result look at all the issues.
Until 'Black' America finds a new identity for self other than the color of a crayon, nothing will change.
The self hate will continue until real ethnic definition invented again, other than the color of a crayon.
China, is a culture and history, Somolia is culture and history, Russian is a culture and history, but 'black' is simply a struggle, a parasite that burst out of the belly of 'whiteness.'
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 4, 2021 19:23:08 GMT -5
I don't think those considered 'Black' by society, really had their independence day until like the civil rights act or acts, of the 1960's.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Aug 14, 2021 21:24:48 GMT -5
If an African, the least person you can really trust in this world, especially if a female, is a person who refers to them self as 'black'...run from such types, for their definition of 'self' will be your downfall.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jan 4, 2022 7:17:12 GMT -5
According to this article, more and more folks are moving to Africa and making it their new perminant home www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/these-are-the-top-african-cities-for-expats-seeking-a-fresh-start/ar-AASoSSP?ocid=msedgntp What the article didn't point out is the ethnicity of those making that move. But one does generally have to be very wealthy to make such a move. I mean it cost enough just to movie across town from one apartment to another, can you imagine the expenses required to make a move across the ocean? I can see such a move costing no less than 50,000 dollars, just the logistics alone, no counting housing, new vehicle, unless old one shipped with you, and other fees, ID's, and other fees new nation charges. If a millionaire one could absorb that, but if a 9-5 type trying to make a fresh start in any continent, it would present many challenges. But if young, bold and adventurous, such challenges might be fun.
|
|
