|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 2, 2014 13:38:00 GMT -5
Here's one thing (of many) I've observed about the American black/white dynamic. For one, race designation then, still effects how people are defined and perceived today. But here's what I observe about the British form of race designation, and how blacks raised under the British Empire mirror this, and that is people like distinct racial designations, catigories. And you can often see this in films, Western films in particular...  Notice how whenever a person, who is designated as 'black' is cast in a movie, they're not mixed with anything, not light skinned, but rather still retain colonial, African appearance. There's deeper implications to what I'm saying here that maybe a few might grasp. Colonial powers, or former such, prefer racial purity....they want a black person, even those cast in movies, to literaly be 'black' or African.  As a person of color, unless you fit into a distinct racial category, you will have a very hard time being cast in any movie. When those raised under the British Empire think 'black' they think African. This includes other black folks in the Southern States of America, who lived under segregation for centuries. To a black person raised in the South, unless you look African with chocolate colored skin, than you're not 'black' to them.  You basically have to have a Hershey's bar skin tone in order for other blacks in the South to consider you 'black'...if you do not, they consider you an odd ball....and add to that if you have a different dialect, one not born and bred in the subservant South, then again, you're considered an odd ball to them. The only way lighter skinned 'blacks' or people of color can make it in film is if they happen to have other assets, like are a musician or comedian, or athlete that crosses over into movies. Otherwise if one is light skinned, mixed with Native American or Asian or Persian, people in the Western Hemisphere will not cast you in any movie as being 'black'...cause to them black is African.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 8, 2014 22:05:49 GMT -5
 Here's an example of what I mean by how 'white casting directors' always cast dull, bland looking blacks, next to whites, even when it comes to females. In this movie 'Possession', all the white females were carefully chosen for their feminine features and values, but the one female black nurse in the film looks like 'butch'. This is done deliberately, cause when you look at any black produced movie or Video by Jay-Z, you see nothing but hot, model looking black females, but when movies are produced by whites, they seem to always cast dull, featureless blacks as extras. This is very insightful into how people perceive one another. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Mar 23, 2014 8:36:56 GMT -5
 Here's yet another example of how 'white' casting producers, always cast 'butch', Male-ish or Masculine type of black females, next to carefully chosen petite, feminine looking white women. In this scene hr from the movie 'The Gingerdead man part 3' this butch looking black female security guard is screening a petite, lean, white lady, the contrast is deliberate... It's done in almost every movie where those who cast actors are 'white', the black woman is always portrayed as dull, bland heavy set and butch or masculine, like a maid or something, the way black females were used in America from about the late 70's on back.. And it's as if through the eyes of those who make movies, black women are still portrayed as this big, cumbersome, utility in purpose only, tools. I will keep leaving examples until you begin to see what I mean...it's done deliberately, the question is why? why do white movie producers love portraying black women as unattractive butch maid types on TV and in movies, while only casting the most elegant, petite, feminine white female actresses next to them, why the deliberate contrast?  (click to enlarge) Again, same movie, side by side contrast And to add insult to black woman's image, they make her overweight while chowing down on a Hoagie sandwich, while escorting petite, feminine white actress. This gives one important insight into how 'black females' are seen or perceived by 'whites' in society, cause garuntee you had a black person produced this movie, the black lady would look much less butch. More examples to follow on this odd phenomena. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 3, 2014 20:24:35 GMT -5
Yet another example of how some are cast in movies (click to enlarge) Yet another example of how black folks are cast next to 'white' actor/actresses. I mean could they not have found a black women with hair? a Weave, wig, or something? No, instead they go out of their way to cast a bald headed black lady, next to a white lady with gorgeous hair...  Again, this is done deliberately, and this is a current movie I rented from Red Box...some kind of zombie movie, but even in zombie movies they still always find the most bland looking blacks to cast next to dazzling whites, deliberately, it's like controlling how people perceive things. Why is this done? And if I'm ever on set, I will ask them this question to their face. Behavior, patterns, like this are parcular to me, almost like a mental illness.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 13, 2014 17:30:09 GMT -5
It annoys me when
It annoys me when, even as person of color, they force inject 'blacks' or other minorities into commercials, or scenes, where in real life they would not be, it just feels so fake and forced...
And they always choose the dullest looking, most stereotyped looking minority actor or actress.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 27, 2014 21:13:48 GMT -5
Not sure how I'm classified...but must blog...dice say so..
Not much to say right now...
Alive and breathing, not much else to say right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 17, 2015 20:37:39 GMT -5
Another example of how 'blacks' are portrayed by 'white casting producers' in moviesStar Wars  (click to enlarge) I mean of all the 'black' males they could of cast, all the different shades of black, males of color, notice they, the white casting producers, pic the 'black' male with the most Africanized features they could find? Read above post for history of this.. Like examples in above posts say, 'white' casting producers, when it comes to casting blacks in movies love 'contrast'...and they still see 'black' as African slave ship type black. If you're lighter skinned, or mixed with Indian or have other features other than African, forget about being cast in a movie, if the casting producers are 'white', cause they only seem to still go after colonial slave ship images of blacks, it's like that version of black is just stuck in their minds like glue. (I mean why would a dude from outer space, still resemble a colonial slave ship African from Earth?)
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Oct 3, 2015 22:35:46 GMT -5
White males given more emotional range in movie scripts and in TV roles As seen above, white male is practically playing the role of a female by residing in, being comforted by, a black male. The white male is 'straight', yet it's acceptable for them to basically be portrayed as a beta male in the presence of a black male who is comforting them in above scene from popular TV series. No black male would ever be allowed to play such a role. White males are give a much broader range of emotion and looks, when it comes to casting, where as black males are only cast as 'butch' types, gangsta types, with no feminine traits at all what so ever. It seems black males are the standard by which all others , male or female, measure their femininity by. White males can look 'cute, black males are not suppose to, society won't accept it, at least not mainstream. Main stream casting producers are only interested in cast black males as goblin types, where as like in picture above, white males can be cast as delicate and frail, almost female, yet 'straight'. It's done so regularly that no one really questions it, but this is the Zone, everything gets questioned and examined here cause nothing humans do is by accident, there's a reason behind every type of behavior and belief.
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jan 7, 2016 8:31:57 GMT -5
At least Star Wars casting producers could of found a more handsome B Jedi(This handsome male of color would of made a much better Jedi, much more handsome than guy below) I mean there are plenty of handsome black males out there, of different colors and shades, but Star Wars goes out and finds, casts, the most non handsome, primitive, tribal village, looking blck Jedi they could conjure up in the Universe..why? Again read all the above posts. I mean it would be like me walking into some small town, like say Colfax, WA, and going into some local bar and grill, and just casting the first 'white' farmer guy I saw, and saying 'OK, you'll do'. Seems that's about all the effort they put into finding and casting blck Jedi. 
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Jul 31, 2016 22:14:29 GMT -5
Here's yet another example of how 'white' casting producers, always cast 'butch', Male-ish or Masculine type of black females, next to carefully chosen petite, feminine looking white women. In this scene hr from the movie 'The Gingerdead man part 3' this butch looking black female security guard is screening a petite, lean, white lady, the contrast is deliberate... It's done in almost every movie where those who cast actors are 'white', the black woman is always portrayed as dull, bland heavy set and butch or masculine, like a maid or something, the way black females were used in America from about the late 70's on back.. And it's as if through the eyes of those who make movies, black women are still portrayed as this big, cumbersome, utility in purpose only, tools. I will keep leaving examples until you begin to see what I mean...it's done deliberately, the question is why? why do white movie producers love portraying black women as unattractive butch maid types on TV and in movies, while only casting the most elegant, petite, feminine white female actresses next to them, why the deliberate contrast? (click to enlarge) Again, same movie, side by side contrast And to add insult to black woman's image, they make her overweight while chowing down on a Hoagie sandwich, while escorting petite, feminine white actress. This gives one important insight into how 'black females' are seen or perceived by 'whites' in society, cause garuntee you had a black person produced this movie, the black lady would look much less butch. More examples to follow on this odd phenomena.  It's like a phenom...I mean of all the 1000's of more petite model looking B females they could of cast, they deliberately find the most husky B female they can to contrast her with 'white' counter parts. You can observe this in almost every movie...it's down right weird and creepy and there's some kind of phycology being this selection process. And it's done on purpose, the 'B' actress always has to look more husky than female counterpart... But if you've watched hip-hop videos, any one can see there's plenty of feminine looking black females out there, rappers, Jay-Z, Ice Cube certainly have no problem finding them, so why can't Hollywood movie casters find them? It's cause they don't want to, and again the question becomes why? This is how perception is formed, when those in control deliberately repeat same actions over that show another or others in a bad contrasting light. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the black actress is super nice, charming, sweet ect, but physically it's like Sesame Street, where they have the box and it's like 'Which one of these don't belong'.  If I could interview a Hollywood casting director I'd like to ask them 'Why do you all always deliberately find the most husky, B female and cast in movies next to petite 'W' actors and actresses?...why why why?The zone was onto this back in 2014...and funny how it continues. |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 10, 2018 22:20:18 GMT -5
Why are husky, featureless 'B' women still always cast next to cute, feminine 'W' women in movies and on TV, even in 2018?
Sorry, but this nonsense is still going on where featureless, bland or husky looking 'B' women still seem to be cast next to feminine, cute, white lady's, and or even males...this is a pattern!!
And patterns mean something...
It would be like me always going out and finding the most husky white women, and casting then next to the most slender, cute, black females...it's a deliberate pattern.
My questions is why?
Do you want more examples??
Those who control the image of others really have the power, or at least over the stupid.
Again, look at a rap video, and see the type of women of color rappers chose for their videos, vs the type of homely, maid looking, 1958 type 'B' females that are always cast in Hollywood movies by older 'W' or 'J' males...and again, why is that?
Why can't both the 'W' female and 'B' female both look good, young and fresh?
When people do the same things over and over again, without question or thought (patterns) they remind me of hardwired insects incapable of thinking...
It's scary actually...more examples to follow for those who do not believe...
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 10, 2018 22:27:36 GMT -5
And sadly the same is done with 'youth' who are cast for movies..
Notice 'W' youth, males, look near angelic, or androgimous (however spelled)...just go to next Netflix.
But whenever 'B' youth (males) cast, again, casting directer seems to go out of their way to find the most frightening look 'B' youth they can find...and again why?
Why is this done over and over again?
Blacks always portrayed as featurless goblins in film, where as only the most beatiful 'whites' cast to star in movies...why?
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Nov 24, 2018 18:43:38 GMT -5
Every movie made in the West that I see is the same, whether horror or comedy, drama, thriller whatever. 1. Only the cutest, most dainty, 'W' women cast to appear on film 2. 'B' females, when cast next to 'W' females, always look 'butch' and heavy set and very bland and or homely (this is done deliberately)(when humans do things deliberately over and over and over again, it scares me, especially when they cannot be honest with themselves and or others and admit 'why'? 3. 99.5% of movies always portray 'W' females, or girls, being what hero of film fights for, willing to die for, hardly ever is a 'B' or woman of color, every worth dying for, or portrayed as 'precious' in 99.5% of films... A few exceptions are 'The Body Guard' with Whitney Houston, and oddly enough 'Jurassic Park 2', where that adopted B girl of scientist was presented as 'precious point', and or worth dying for.  Ye, so what! What's your stupid point? I have no point, I just observe and note things You're jealous, aren't you? No, cause in real life I work around and interact with 'common' W women, and rarely do they look like women on film so again, I know it's all by deliberate design. I'm going to beat you up, I don't appreciate you pointing all this out! |
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 13, 2020 19:27:11 GMT -5
Everything this section states is still true
Everything this section says is still true, could share images from TV commercials and movies to prove it.
And that is the only types allowed to look soft and elegant on regular basis on TV productions are 'W' women, who are always cast as young, thin and near perfect in looks.
But then, as usual, such women always contrasted with either
1. Older 'W' or 'B' or any males like over the age of 40, with plumber Roto-Rooter look and body,
2. Thick, 1950's house maid looking Southern Blck female, who looks husky next to super thin 'W' model or actress
Same o same o, even today, and again, I can include photos soon, or if just honest with self, can observe on your own and save me the time.
But again, like always, my question is why?, why is that done deliberately over and over again?
How come casting directors, time and time again, when 'W' or 'J', always cast the most bland looking black females, and males in their movies?
And why do same directors always ignore even younger 'W' males who have that Androgynous look?
Seems the only 'W' males allowed in TV roles or commercials are again those who have that older, Plumber, wide body Janitor look.
Again why is that done?
|
|
|
|
Post by X factor on Apr 13, 2020 19:57:23 GMT -5
Why are 'B' females always portrayed as 'butch' in movies? Again, look at the 'B' female, I don't know, maybe they're fighting over food, do to shortage cause of Corona, but I do know the 'B' female in that scene looks menacing, and as usual 'atop' helpless 'W' female.  Again, why? Why do 'Jewish' and 'W' males, who run Hollywood always love to find the most husky, tough looking 'B' females and give them starring roles? Yet always seek out the most 'helpless', dainty 'W' females to cast the black ones next to. What psychology is behind that mindset??? And I can give you 100 more examples.
|
|
Ye, so what! What's your stupid point?